David Bellamy has sent me a link to the story of a man in Ukraine who has spent 35 days in a cage with lions. Here is a photo for you, and you can see an entire slideshow over here:
Zoo owner and artist Aleksandr Pylyshenko looks out from between bars of a cage, next to female African lion Katya, at a private zoo situated in his yard in the city of Vasilyevka, southeastern Ukraine August 3, 2011. Pylyshenko decided to spend five weeks in a cage with a pair of African lions, Katya and Samson, to get money for improving the lions’ living conditions, according to local media. He is broadcasting it on internet to attract the public’s attention to plight of wild animals in private Ukrainian zoos, which do not get enough fundings.
There is, of course, a certain cultural reality behind this, and I thought my readers might find some background I can provide useful for the understanding of this piece of news.
In the Soviet Union, zoological gardens were extremely popular. We had a really big one in my city and used to visit it often. As a child, I always felt a lot of discomfort at the sight of polar bears, giraffes or elephants stuck in small cages in what was very obviously not a comfortable environment for them. I could never understand how visiting a zoo could be considered fun. I haven’t been to any zoos in North America, so I don’t know what the conditions there are like. Even though I’m not a huge animal-lover (to put it very mildly), I always suffer at the idea that a poor creature is kept away from its natural habitat because people find it enjoyable to gawk at it for some puzzling reason.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, funding for state-owned zoos became very scarce. Many animals simply starved or froze to death during our harsh winters. At the same time, many private citizens came into big money. Post-Soviet nouveau riches competed with each other in how much money each could spend on something completely outrageous. Among them, it soon became prestigious to have an iguana, an alligator, a monkey, a python, or a tiger of their own. There came into existence a huge black market dealing in exotic animals.
Eventually, this situation led to some people opening “private zoos”, like the one owned by the guy in the photo. Anybody can build a cage in the backyard of their house in a village, like he did, bring in some animals, and keep them there. It might seem strange to you that a guy could keep lions, a bear and two lynxes in his backyard just because he wants to, but in Ukraine it’s not a big deal. As the owner says on his website, he bought a lioness for just $3500 + shipping costs.
Clarissa's Blog 
How isn’t he afraid for his life? Lions can be unpredictable. Has he a suitable education and experience of working with large predators? “Zoo owner and artist” don’t seem to sound like that.
*It might seem strange to you that a guy could keep lions, a bear and two lynxes in his backyard just because he wants to*
Why should it seem strange to US citizens? F.e.
Many people do keep big cats like bobcats, tigers, and lions as pets. Tigers and lions are surprisingly easy and inexpensive to purchase as pets. This means anyone can own a large powerful carnivore whether or not they are equipped to properly care for them. Pet tigers have been involved in several fatalities and maulings in the US and Canada in recent years
I suppose in US, one would have to pay taxes for the private zoo. Is it so in Russia?
LikeLike
If I discovered that some guy kept a lion in his backyard in my town, I wouldn’t rest until he was stopped. He can just get drunk one day and forget to lock the cage, and then what?
It’s like this guy in Norway who was building a nuclear reactor at home. There the authorities stopped him, at least.
LikeLike
Clarissa, how would you stop him, if it isn’t against the law? At least, in many places in US it’s perfectly lawful.
Many keep wolves too, which aren’t not dangerous either, even if seem to USA citizens less exotic.
LikeLike
I have no information about it being legal within city limits. I get it that people might keep animals on secluded farms, etc. But INSIDE a town? If that is legal, then I’d lobby to make it illegal. Because it’s unconscionable that an entire town should be at risk because of one jerk’s whim.
LikeLike
I don’t think wolves are any more dangerous than large dogs. I have known people who kept coyotes. The frightened me far less than many other large dogs.
LikeLike
There are people in my own neighborhood who allow their nasty dogs to run around without a muzzle and unleashed. I keep hoping that I manage to take a picture of that the next time I see it and get them fined at least.
LikeLike
There are tons of sites warning that wolf hybrids, not even wolves, aren’t dogs, are much more dangerous and how one should think carefully before buying one. Don’t know RE coyotes.
Don’t know about city limits, but found this info page with interesting bits:
*•Louisville and •Broomfield – It is unlawful to own a wolf-hybrid within city limits.*
See, the law differentiates between them and dogs.
*•Lubbock County – Prohibits the possession of exotic animals; however, a grandfather clause allows existing animals to remain where they are.*
Why?
*•Apache Junction – Prohibits private possession of monkeys as “pets.”*
What about lions?
http://www.bornfreeusa.org/b4a2_exotic_animals_ords.php
LikeLike
Kitty kitty kitty!
LikeLike