White Nationalism, Cont’d

Let’s take the New Zealand terrorist. We keep hearing he’s a white nationalist. But which nation is he passionately attached to? Australia? France, which he writes about more than any other country? The US where he wants to provoke the repeal of the Second Amendment? New Zealand? To be a nationalist you need to swear allegiance to a particular nation. Which one is his?

To the contrary, his worldview conceives of no differences between nations. He sees them as identical pieces of the larger, and much more important, formation called the West. To him, it’s all about the supra-national concept of race. This is the opposite of nationalism. Once again, let’s look at Ukraine. Ukrainian nationalism includes whites, Tatars, and even the minuscule minority of blacks and defines itself in opposition to the Russian nationalism. To a white Ukrainian nationalist, a Nigerian resident who embraces Ukraine is a dearly beloved brother while a white Russian who hates Ukraine is the enemy.

A nationalism that doesn’t operate with the concept of a nation as the central one is an oxymoron.


2 thoughts on “White Nationalism, Cont’d”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.