Towards Segregation

There was a huge scandal when people saw this photo and, based on the skin color of the participants, assumed the white man was hurting the black woman:

Because that’s the only reason a white guy would touch a black girl, right? To do something evil.

His employer immediately fired him based on malicious Twitter allegations and nothing else.

Well, it turns out he was saving her life. The woman finally managed to get herself heard and explained the situation. But the guy has already been smeared by every information outlet possible. And fired.

The logical next step in leftist activism is complete racial segregation. Remember that white guy who was eviscerated for hugging a black kid on video? Or that disgusting campaign against mixed-race relationships? Truly evil shit.

7 thoughts on “Towards Segregation”

  1. “The logical next step in leftist activism is complete racial segregation.”

    That isn’t how leftist reductionism works.

    The general pattern of leftist reductionism is like a group of people vote on which of them should be enslaved and have all of their stuff taken by the other members of the group. That is why leftist governments always have (or create) an enemy from within their own group, always attack that enemy, cannibalize or enslave that enemy, and then do it again to the next person in the group.

    All of this black vs white stuff in the USA is the usual division that is fostered so that there can be two groups, so as to then favour one group against the other. In the US, politically, the group that was attacked was the white group on behalf of everyone who wasn’t white, so that things like jobs, housing, loans etc that were in the hands of white people were given to minorities instead.

    Naturally, the politicians and enablers organizing it all are beneficiaries.

    Anyway, regarding segregation, the reason that segregation is not the logical next step is because there is no enemy or conflict when two groups are separated, which means that no single group can be favoured. In a way, as ugly as it sounds segregation solves the problem.

    Since the object is to uphold division and always have an enemy/always have everyone fighting, the logical next step is for another issue to be used to divide everyone, like whether it is okay for a big white man to “defend” a black woman without her asking, so that again everything is reduced to manism vs feminism, big vs small, “consent”, “patriarchy”, or something like that.

    Like

  2. “Anyway, regarding segregation, the reason that segregation is not the logical next step is because there is no enemy or conflict when two groups are separated, which means that no single group can be favoured.”

    Lol.

    Like

  3. American Bandstand, circa late-1950s:
    White teenage girl dances with lead singer Frankie Lymon of The Teenagers
    ….and collective backlash and scandal occurs as a result.

    Would today’s “Rosa Parks” prefer to sit at the back of the bus as a sort of unofficial “black zone” as a gesture of “racial sovereignty”?

    Like

    1. Even in 1968 some freaked out when Petula Clark touched Harry Belafonte…
      I suppose now there would be complaints about a black man condescending to perform with a becky…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.