The difference in correlation with voting between this standard-of-housing index and the overall standard-of-living index suggests, once again, that it’s housing costs, rather than other costs such as groceries or health care, that are crucial to voting Republican or Democrat.
Despite the explanatory power of the Dirt Gap and the Mortgage Gap, these concepts have not been widely discussed.
The problem limiting their popularity may be that they are too objective, too morally neutral.
What people want to hear instead are explanations for why they, personally, are ethically and culturally better than their enemies.

Noticing, Steve Sailer

This is an article from 2005, way before the current inflation that is changing people’s strategy. But the highlighted portion is very true. Moral superiority is addictive, and people seek it out everywhere.

I know, the commenting function has gone to the dogs recently. It’s not you, it’s WordPress futzing with a system that worked perfectly and needed exactly zero improvement. But employees have to justify their salaries, so they improved the comment box into a sorry state. I hope the changes get rolled back soon.

Yes, it’s totally a Tesla Cybertruck. Klara says the owner is the Dad of one of the girls at school. I never expected any rich kids to be at that school, so now I wonder.

Technological advances aren’t always great, and that’s a theme that unites Tesla and the WordPress comment box.

We have removed ourselves to an unpeopled place for a mini-vacation:

It’s not completely unpeopled, to be honest. We came across the owner several times. He used to be in the Secret Service, so it’s impossible to predict where he’s going to crop up.

I’m becoming persuaded that women in Congress from both parties have been bribed by an organization promoting the idea that women are too stupid to be in politics. Or anywhere outside a seraglio.

And even after this, people will flock in droves to vote for the ditzy MTGs, AOCs, and all the rest of them.

Representative democracy only works if everybody is educated to at least some baseline level of civilized discourse and if norms of public behavior are collectively imposed. Once public education collapses and the very idea of civilized behavior and self-restraint is vilified, many people lose their only method of finding out that the disgraceful behavior we are seeing in Congress is not OK. As a result, they vote for the politicians who most closely mirror their own unchecked behavior.

I really wanted to read an in-depth investigative report on the Wa drug cartel. I opened Patrick Winn’s Narcotopia, hoping to find information and insight. Instead, from the first pages, I discovered that the Wa druglords are good because they are indigenous to the area where they live. I’m not remotely indigenous to the area where I live but I don’t believe that either situation is inherently morally charged. What is inherently morally charged is whether you sell drugs. I don’t, and I tend to take that as far more important to my character as to whether I’m “indigenous.”

It gets worse. Winn insists that the US is guilty of Wa’s drug trafficking. Why? Well, because the US is guilty of everything. A bear farts in Magadan, and it’s America’s fault. According to Winn, if Americans would have only given Wa “a little bit of food”, they wouldn’t have cooked and sold meth in the first place. It’s apparently America’s duty to prevent people from becoming drug overlords by feeding them. Of course, the idea that anybody would give up the immense fortunes and power brought in by running a cartel in exchange for a bowl of rice is extremely strange but we’ve heard this reasoning before. Whenever there’s a riot here in the US, we are told that the rioters are looting Louis Vuitton stores because they are perishing of hunger.

It gets better. Winn accuses the CIA of attempting to conduct “regime change” in the territories controlled by the cartel. I keep wondering how do people not get bored of this tired old narrative about CIA regime changes? There’s never any proof but that’s not even the point. We are supposed to accept that “regime change” is a bad thing. But why? Nobody ever explains. Regime change = bad, America = bad, indigenous = good.

People, do help. I saw a car in town today, and it was so unusual. It looked like a futuristic tank. Very geometric, steel-grey. I thought we were being invaded by space aliens.

And now I can’t find it on Google because my descriptions don’t lead to anything like that vehicle.

Does anybody know what I’m talking about and can drop an image? Or a name? This is driving me nuts.

Our particularly gifted friend is at it again:

With students who are resistant to letting knowledge seep in, it sometimes helps to ask a question.

Do the Jewish victims of the genocidal  Palestinian attack on 10/7 have the right to defend themselves from the Jew-hating, murderous, raping, baby-slaughtering savages who committed these atrocities?

No further “rights” questions will be accepted until you formulate a clear answer to mine.

Also, it’s impossible to follow links from an image.

What? Without the bill he seemed to need so desperately to do the same at 5,000 crossings a day? Turns out he’s been able to do it this whole time?

The question of why it’s necessary to wait for 4,000 crossings and not just do it already remains.

So does the question why people who took the narrative that “Republicans in Congress torpedoed the immigration reform bill” seriously are not upset with being lied to.

That’s good news. N said that if there are no debates, he’s not voting at all, and I agree. If the candidates don’t respect us enough to debate, it’s not a real election.

People keep advancing ideas on why it went down so precipitously but that’s the wrong question to answer. It looks like the numbers went back to the norm. The interesting question is why it rose so dramatically in the 1970s and 1980s?

In my part of the world, the most notorious serial killers are from that era, too, so it’s not culture-specific.