Opinions, art, debate
She’s unconvincing as a moderate after a lifetime of being far-left. So yes, her being very far-left until three seconds ago is damaging to her because voters don’t like progressivism. If they did, she’d be running a much more honest campaign instead of trying to pretend she’s somebody she clearly isn’t.
But wait, there’s more:
Instead of withholding food aid from Russia until it disarmed – and it would have worked because the situation was dire – these absolute geniuses disarmed smaller countries next to Russia. This went on for a quarter of a century with Biden, Clinton and Obama being the most complicit.
So when Trump said that this war wouldn’t have happened without Biden, he’s quite literally right. Trump wasn’t in any public office until 2016, two years after the Russian invasion began.
Here’s a video of Biden passionately lobbying for the disarmament of Ukraine in 1991:
Biden says in his speech that if Ukraine isn’t disarmed, there would be “a war like none seen before.”
Well, he’s seeing it now and he’s fully complicit in it happening.
What else can I say about the absolute lunacy of the US foreign policy?
I don’t know whether it’s because today I
– have been up since 4:30
– gave a talk and taught two classes
-translated a 4-page document
-filed two reports at work
-did my German exercises
-graded student assignments
-drove to St Louis in shitty traffic
-drove back from St Louis in shittier traffic
-cooked sea bass
and I’m now wiped out and seeing things that are not there but I went to look at the news and it’s all full of Trump being worse than Hitler all over again, and are we back in 2017 or is this really really funny?
I didn’t know it would get to the point where “Hitler” would sound hilarious.
Kamala Harris is an American Justin Trudeau. He got into politics through no achievement of his own, riding on the coattails of a successful older man. He’s completely vapid. Far-far-left. Pro-open borders, lockdowns, race-baiting.
He’s been absolutely poisonous to the economy and the public space, weak on foreign policy, corrupt.
Just as Canadians are finally waking up and getting to shed this loser, Americans are preparing to saddle themselves with their own Trudeau.
OK, so then who will teach students about the amazing achievements of our civilization? Should we simply cede our culture and history to be vilified, mocked and bastardized?
Yes, let’s forget all that and go make technology to ensure that those who despise us have all the technological means at their disposal to better control us.
After getting up at 4:30 to speak at a conference, by lunchtime I became very loopy. Laughing with the lab workers, telling funny stories. They were terrified because they’ve never seen me like this. I’m always very contained at work. You can’t look like I do and be a smiley, giggly person if you want to be taken seriously as a scholar. So I’m usually grim. Poor lab workers saw the side of me that I never reveal at work.
Now they will be even more scared of me than usual.
It’s a great time to send in anonymous questions because I’m in a state where I’ll reveal all there is left to reveal.
The UN needs to be disbanded. Or, at the very least, all US funding of this shameful organization should be withdrawn. It’s egregious that US taxpayers should pay even one cent of the salary of a bureaucrat who adores the regimes that despise our country.
The NATO also needs to be disbanded.
Both organizations are money-grubbing schemes with no use for the US.
So many words to explain the existence of low-libido people:
These “incels” are simply low-libido men who don’t know how to process their health issue. If a healthy male under the age of retirement needs some particularly “hot” women to get going, he’s low-libido. Similarly, if a woman in an eligible-male-rich environment like Montreal or NYC just can’t find anybody attractive, she’s low-libido. This doesn’t mean they are bad but simply wired in a certain way that is not the norm.
People would reject the idea of social engineering to remove “inequities” created by simple physiology but when the inequity in their lives is a result of their own physiology, it’s all “let’s immediately engineer away this unpleasant reality by reshuffling society.”
If these perpetually unmatched people look around, they’ll see that everybody is paired up and very happy without dwelling much on which number on the scale of hotness their honey is. Everybody on here who is happily married: did you ever dwell on how your lovey ranks on some scale? I’m betting you never did because you are simply physically healthy. Your desire is switched on without theorizing and pouting because that’s the norm. We’d all be extinct without it.
There’s absolutely no shame in being low-libido or pre-diabetic or near-sighted, etc. What is shameful is to come up with grand theories to hide from your physiology.
I’m giving another one of my 5 am talks in a few hours. And I’m on for another talk on Thursday but that one is at the godly hour of 9 am. There’s quite a lot of teaching, writing and translating between the talks but these are the last ones for October, so I’ll just plough through them.
It’s good to be in demand, don’t get me wrong but I honestly can’t wait to go to my conference in November, lock myself in a hotel room and stare at the ceiling for a couple of days.
Clarissa's Blog 