The last quote today, I promise. But it’s too good not to be shared:

No wonder Anglo Leftist academics feel such innate sympathy with Jihadists; they both enjoy whacking people with sacred texts which have no real relevance to the present moment.

The rest of the article is also brilliant.

Suppose the Republicans nominate Jeb Bush, as seems at least plausible. What’s the Clinton message in such a contest? “My husband had a better job creation record than your brother”? She won’t be able to portray him as a candidate who owes everything to his famous last name.

A very bizarre presidential campaign awaits us.

The Democrats need to stop presenting candidates who were never in charge of anything. Are there no Democratic former governors around? A president who used to be a governor makes more sense than a president who was a senator for two minutes.

Of course, we are facing a contest between two people who are only known to us because they once stood next to someone who actually achieved something. And that’s just boring.

In case anyone doubted that all fanatics are equally disgusting, here is a shocking photo of the Charlie Hebdo march with women edited out of the image:

See original at the link.

The new Charlie Hebdo cover:

These are incredibly brilliant people. With so many of their comrades dead and in an environment of grief and rage, they came up with the perfect cover for the magazine.

As we all know by now, this was a struggling magazine that was not likely to survive for much longer. Cartoonists go out of business faster than cobblers these days. The terrorists obviously knew that the interest in the cartoons that supposedly offended them was minimal. And now the whole world is waiting for the magazine’s next installment.

This epic cover is the most motivational thing I have seen in a while.

Seeing the profoundly stupid struggle to figure out the multiplication table is very entertaining:

Maybe it’s time to stop attacking men for having power, or denying that their power is real, and instead try to understanding why they have had so much of it for so long. Spoiler alert: it has little or nothing to do with muscle mass. The narrative of implied violence that the tastemakers use to explain away the strength of men throughout history is oversimplified and barren of dignity. We can do better. And men should do better, no matter how hard it is.

No, you silly little piece of fluff. It has everything to do with the absence of reliable contraception until extremely recently.

And then people keep saying that college education is not necessary. There is an incredible number of completely stupid, grievously uneducated people around us. The post I culled this bit of idiocy from is extremely long. Its author obviously is passionately attached to the belief that he needs to have opinions. But he has had no access to information, so he just clucks aimlessly, trying to produce a semblance of thought in a complete intellectual vacuum.