A couple of months ago, I bought this package of boiled sausage at the Global Foods store.

But then when I wanted to eat it, it was nowhere to be found. Nobody else in the house has any interest in it, not even the cat. I was worried. I thought, dude, if I ate two pounds of boiled sausage and retained no memory of the event, this isn’t good. My blood sugars must be a lot less controlled than I think. Forgetting what you ate like this is evidence of being hypoglycemic. I was genuinely concerned. And sad to be deprived of the experience of eating the boiled sausage.

The other day, I spotted something bright colored under the driver’s seat of my car. And yes, it was the lost boiled sausage. It must have rolled out of the shopping bag on the way home from Global Foods. And stayed there, sad and uneaten. Fortunately, the wrapping is very hermetic. We’ve had a few scorchers recently and…. you can imagine.

I have three big events next week, none of which I want to attend. My mother in Canada is threatening to MAID herself out of spite. I won’t be able to go to Holy Week services on Tuesday or Friday. Both at work and at church people are bickering like they get paid to do it. If I hear one more complaint about the placement of the panikhida table, I’ll blow, and then somebody else will need an urgent panikhida. There’s so much to do at work, I feel like a deer in highlights. So today I put on a pink skirt with heart appliques and took the 67 all the way to the Global Foods store for two packages of boiled sausage. And a bunch of very healthy stuff too including pine cone jam for my husband, of course. So now I feel better.

The newspaper of record doesn’t know what the letters in NATO stand for. We have truly arrived at heights of egregious incompetence.

There’s a whole bunch of people responsible for putting out the paper, and none of them caught it? I’m very interested in hearing what their salaries are to publish this absolute slop.

When Klara was a baby, she would watch me and N have a conversation and then make gurgles at us in the most conversational tone imaginable. She probably thought, “The large warm creatures routinely look at each other and take turns to make a series of noises. I should do that, too.”

I often feel like that when people make obligatory conversational noises at each other for no practical reason whatsoever.

Around year 1985, the literature of developed countries began to feature female characters whose only dream was to attach themselves to a man who’d treat them like a baby. They very aggressively didn’t want to have a baby because they wanted to be the baby themselves. It’s been forty years but the genre of novels about middle-aged women pursuing the dream of being treated like literal babies by their male sex partners is still going strong. They buy adult-sized onesies, spend most of the day sleeping, pout, lisp, and throw the most vicious tantrums when told that it’s time to grow up.

Before then, novels about extremely childlike women whose only ambition is to be babied by often very random men were not a thing. Dickens has one such character and makes it clear that an adult-sized female baby is a curse to any man dumb enough to marry her. Literature about women showed them being interested in life, relationships, marriage, writing, reading, growing, doing. But since 1985, there’s been an inundation of novels of aggressive female de-growth. This Story Might Save Your Life is a recent example. Its main character, a podcaster named Joy, tries to figure out which man can better accommodate her childishness but never considers that an infant in her mid-thirties isn’t very cute. Especially since she is rewarded for her behavior with immense riches and every possible comfort.

In this sense, the US literature is where the Spanish novel was 30 years ago and Argentinean 15 years ago. Spanish-language authors haven’t rewarded their overgrown babies with great wealth and general adulation since Claudia Piñeiro’s A Little Luck (2015). In the Anglophone world, self-infantilizing women are still in literary demand.

It’s so cool, people. I can pick up a novel in German and read it. And yes, it took 669 days to get here but this obviously wasn’t my priority this whole time. I have a trillion other things going on.

I feel a little like Clive James who is my role model as a literary critic, reader and polyglot.

Nothing compares with the feeling of learning a new language and reading your first novel in it, feeling that a new faucet of yourself is being created with every sentence you read.

It’s this novel and not another one because I picked it up for $1 at the university bookstore and the language is very clear, so I can read it with not a lot of effort.

After years of accusations that my Spanish and English are too Germanic, I have finally embraced the charge and am becoming a speaker of German.

Donald Trump has privately asked cabinet members in recent weeks whether he should replace his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, venting frustration that she shielded a former deputy who undercut his rationale for war with Iran, according to two people briefed on the discussions.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/trump-tulsi-gabbard-intelligence-chief

Finally! Aloha bimbo has got to go. Dumb, useless, zero achievements. Seriously, what exactly did she achieve in her job in all this time? She lisps, bats her eyelashes and does jackshit.

Me and my childhood friend Ira, now a nurse in Israel:

One thing that stunned me in Slezkine’s book is how extremely successful Jews were in the Russian Empire in finance, banking, business and manufacturing circles. We are talking the decades of 1870-1890s, and the numbers are insane. I had this image in my head of miserable, persecuted, long-suffering Jews in the Pale of Settlement, when in reality, the percentage of Jews among, for example, factory owners in Kyiv, Odessa and St Petersburg was insane relative to their percentage in the population.

Slezkine gives pages and pages of numbers, endless bibliographical references. It’s incontrovertible evidence, and I had absolutely no idea. Dude. This is hardcore. It is even more hardcore that the children of all these very successful Jews then went on to organize the Communist revolution. I thought they were reacting to poverty and misery but I was wrong. Oh wow.

I’m very glad I found this book based on a random Twitter post rubbishing Slezkine for being pro-Putin. But he’s part-Jewish himself and see what I wrote earlier today about that.

Slezkine offers the best explanation I have found so far why Jews are almost invariably pro-Russian and anti-Ukrainian. If the goal of embracing national belonging consists of no longer feeling like an outsider and a loser, it doesn’t make sense to identify with a newly formed nation that is constantly aggressed against.

There’s a profound dislike of Ukrainian nationhood among Jews which can’t be explained by the history of pogroms which were near and dear to the Russian Empire at large. Slezkine’s explanation makes much more sense. It’s just a reflective “I don’t want to be with the victims anymore.” Ukrainian national identity, to my endless annoyance, is deeply tied to the feelings of victimhood. There are efforts to change that but they are recent and don’t yet dominate.