Pío Moa is insanely biased in favor of Francisco Franco. But mainstream narratives are even more insanely biased against. One would think that half a century after Franco’s death we could all calm down and discuss him without foaming at the mouth. But that’s not happening, and one has to scratch one’s way to some semblance of knowledge about the actual facts by reading different accounts and finding the middle ground between the extremes.
The glaringly obvious thing that nobody in Spain is ready to discuss is why the country was stuck between Franco and Stalinism and had to make that choice in a civil war. Why did things get so extreme? Why is the reaction to these events so overinflated almost a hundred years later?
Extreme forms of attachment to the past are an avoidance mechanism aimed at hiding from the present. This is true for societies as well as individuals. In Spain it’s not possible to discuss the civil war and the dictatorship in a dispassionate manner. People freak out and start spluttering. Pío Moa might be wrong on a bunch of things but at least he’s trying to have a normal conversation.


