I won a mystery box of 4 novels. Imagine my joy and excitement. Four novels! I was over the moon.

And then I opened the mystery box. Whoever the insane bastard is who put it together must never be allowed around books. Or people.

The mystery box contained four novels, all set during WWII and all featuring on their covers a woman standing with her back to the reader. Four female backsides during WWII. Is there a weirdo who would want to read four books in a row that are identical on subject and cover art?

I haven’t had a similar book-related letdown in years. I hate WWII novels ever since we were veritably persecuted with WWII content in the USSR. Plus, I’ve read five trillion novels about the Spanish Civil War. I’m so over war novels.

Can anybody suggest any interesting conversation topics? I’ve uncharacteristically got nothing because all my energy goes to not going off on people who are eating my brain out with a little teaspoon.

I use this notebook called A Life Sentence to write down one sentence about every day of my life.

It’s such a great thing because I can go back to any day that I recorded and remember the most important thing about it. The memories come back so vividly.

I highly recommend this practice. One can have many wonderful days simply slip one’s memory.

One thing that blows my mind completely is that the service sector in Ukraine is now better than in Europe or the US. Service was Soviet-type in the post-Soviet space up until 2005. My sister traveled back to Ukraine in that year and reported rude, contemptuous shop assistants and shamelessly defrauding waiters.

It was normal back then to charge a customer who ordered apple juice twice, for the juice and the apple. It was also normal to mock a customer’s appearance and mental capacity loudly and obnoxiously. It was normal to pretend you aren’t noticing a customer or laugh contemptuously in their face. This was the remnant of the Soviet era when shop assistants guarded the access to prized consumer goods amidst endless shortages and could afford to torture desperate customers.

Then it all magically changed, and today Ukrainians in Europe and America politely inquire why the service is so bad. My sister met with her Ukrainian colleagues, and they told stories about service in Ukraine that truly stun the imagination. I had no idea such dramatic improvement can occur so fast and on such a large scale.

I asked my Ukrainian Fulbrighter about the most important thing she realized in her stay in the US.

She said she realized she wants to go back to Ukraine and have another baby.

NOW: "There is only one solution – Communist Revolution" chanted Communist group marching among the NO KINGS protest as thousands gathered in NYC to protest

Video by @yyeeaahhhboiii2 | Licensing @FreedomNTV Desk@freedomnews.tv pic.twitter.com/D1Jf1lna0v

— Oliya Scootercaster 🛴 (@ScooterCasterNY) March 28, 2026

Why would it be so much more unacceptable if they marched with swastikas? Especially since there would have been no swastikas if the red flags hadn’t come first. What is it with people that the mother of great evil is considered cute and quaint? How do people break it up in their minds? Hitler is bad but Stalin who brought him to power, trained his army, kissed his ass, and partitioned Europe with him is wonderful?

Where are the calls for Dem leaders to disavow the Commie attendees? We’ve had years of outrage over Charlottesville. Where’s the outrage about this?

What is the argument for buying anything except a fully-self-driving (supervised) car? https://t.co/KVCeOBQahC

— Charles Murray (@charlesmurray) March 28, 2026

There’s a trillion reasons but here’s one. The GPS software doesn’t allow the option of choosing a safe area to drive through. Because it’s racist to create routes that specifically avoid high-crime areas. My GPS is insanely dedicated to having me drive through East St Louis. But I’m behind the wheel, so I ignore its directions.

A self-driving car will self-drive you into gang territory, and you won’t have a way of preventing it. Of all the people on the planet, one would expect Charles Murray to understand how this works but somehow he’s failing to see it.

We are three seconds away from our cars reporting our efforts to racistly avoid places like East St Louis and compiling a file on the most egregious offenders, and here’s Mr Murray, happily promoting these carceral devices. I’m learning my routes by heart and preparing to take the SIM card and the battery out of the phone for every ride. It’s going well. I can get in and out of St Louis safely through countryside back roads if necessary.

A month ago, a group of MENA migrants beat up a gay couple in the Basque city of Vitoria in Spain. They were released. Yesterday, they knifed several young people in Vitoria. It’s very likely that they will be released again very soon.

This is the future of embracing “the indigenous ways of knowledge” over the West’s civilization. Of course, there’s nobody more indigenous to Spain than the gay Basques assaulted by the migrants. But “indigenous” is a word that means the exact opposite of its original meaning these days. It means primitive, uncivilized, non-Western. It is a great and wonderful achievement of the Western civilization that women and gay people can walk around, unmolested and unbothered. It’s not the norm. It’s a civilizational advance of one single civilization. It’s a great advance, and I love it.

The reason why neither women nor gays can say that it’s not OK that this civilizational advance is being taken away is what I discussed in the previous post. They can’t bring themselves to say that Western is better than non-Western. They will get beaten and raped in increasing numbers and will accept the consolation prize in the form of rainbow flags and female superheroes in movies. But they will not transgress the foundational idea of leftism which is that non-Western is superior to Western.

The problem, as I keep repeating, is not that we are too Western. It’s that we are not Western enough. We can’t say, “fuck off, you stupid savage, leave my gay brothers alone.” We are siding with savagery against ourselves, against gay friends and teenage sisters. Because we don’t believe we are better. We believe we are worse. That is the source of our problems. The good news is that we can cure this without giving up air conditioners and dishwashers. We don’t need to dismantle the nation-state and dedicate ourselves to subsistence farming. Things are not nearly as bad as all that.

When I was an undergraduate student in Canada in early 2000s, I had a professor who was an Italian Communist. A tall, very handsome, very gay far-left dude. Brilliant but mega annoying with his leftism. I was fresh from the USSR, and most lectures consisted of me and the professor yelling at each other to the great enjoyment of other students. This was the leftism of 25 years ago, and who knows, maybe the professor has traveled in the direction of Paul Kingsnorth since then. I haven’t kept in touch.

The Italian Communist professor’s whole schtick was that the Western civilization is too cerebral, logical, and obsessed with rationality and correctness. The professor accused the West of demolishing the indigenous ways of knowing which, in contrast, are intuitive, more natural, and less obsessed with noxious things like punctuality, attention to detail and rules of social behavior.

When I listened to Iain Mcgilchrist’s Ways of Attending, I immediately recognized the ideas I first heard from the Italian Communist. Mcgilchrist adds the word “hemisphere” to the argument and coaches it in terms of his studio of brain functioning. In everything else, his theory is identical to that earlier leftism of the 2000s. Like Paul Kingsnorth, he’s one of those old-school leftists who are upset with the consequences of their own philosophy. They are horrified that liberalism has gone all neoliberal all the time and are trying to carve out a niche for themselves on the Right. I found out about Mcgilchrist from Kingsnorth’s book Against the Machine because Mcgilchrist is a huge influence on Kingsnorth, and now it’s clear why.

Kingsnorth and Mcgilchrist are both extremely intelligent, brilliant men. But they deeply dislike the entirety of the Western civilization which is the animating force of the leftist project. They can coach their repulsion towards the West in the terminology of brain science, ecologism or newfound religiosity. But the foundation of their thinking is the same. They simply don’t like the West. This is very different from the position of a standard right-winger who believes that the West is the best and that all of the problems we are experiencing are caused by the West losing the self-assurance of being the best that humanity has been able to offer. Kingsnorth and Co want to undo the West completely. Right-wingers, on the other hand, want to restore it to its glory.

People are mocking this old headline without understanding that it was absolutely correct:

Zelensky won 74% of the vote in 2019 because he was extremely pro-Russian. He’s not ethnically Ukrainian and not a Ukrainian nationalist. He was a Russian lackey who made his money by mocking Ukrainians for the entertainment of Russian audiences. This is why he was elected. Voters wanted him to make nice with Russia. And he did. He all but crawled on his stomach to please Putin. Which is why I hated him back then.

But it didn’t work. Russia’s war is 100% internally motivated. You can’t do anything from the outside to stop it. That there are literally zero people in the US capable of explaining this to the public is very disturbing. Imagine how many other issues there are where we are being misled by morons.

Most people’s brains can’t tolerate complexity and they seek jingles and stock phrases to believe the pressure of complexity against their untrained, weak neural connection.