Reader Stille asked a very important question as to what the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is at this point.
I believe that underneath all of the empty sloganeering aimed at people who like to hear familiar and comforting sounds all of the time, there is a single yet crucial distinction:
Republicans believe that if you’ve got to cut a dog’s tail off, it’s better to do it in a single clean cut instead of dragging out the painful process indefinitely. They want to roll back the nation-state ‘ s caring government* now and let the post-nation – state sweep in immediately.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe that the transformation will be painful and there is still time to soften the blow.
This contrast can be easily observed in Obama’s extremely proactive SOTU last night and the Republican insistence on tinkering with the boring issue of abortion in the newly Republican congress. The Congress chose to concentrate on this matter precisely because it’s so irrelevant to the voters. The downside of the caring government was always its obsessive need to control and legislate morality. It is no longer possible for a government to do that, and the Republican Congress is reminding us (not consciously, of course) what we will be gaining when we let the nation-state go.
It’s time to stop clinging to our old party allegiances** and reevaluate them in view of the new reality. Do you believe that the transition away from the nation-state should be softened? Or do you believe that it makes no sense to drag the process out?
I obviously believe that it should be softened as much as possible.
* As we have learned in our discussions of the nation-state, such a caring government is both a wonderful and a horrible thing.
** An incapacity to let go of old systems of belief and change one’s mind is a symptom of intellectual caducity.