I didn’t know much about Tammy Baldwin before The Washington Times informed me of how amazing she is:
She is a radical feminist who champions gay marriage, abortion on demand, government-funded contraception and war on religious freedom. She is the Sandra Fluke of Wisconsin politics — a postmodern socialist who wants government to underwrite birth control pills and homosexual unions. Ms. Baldwin is the antithesis of the working-class liberalism embodied by Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry Truman.
Ms. Baldwin has made no secret of her lesbian lifestyle. She is a vocal supporter of gay pride and the LGBT community. She told the liberal Huffington Post that her Senate candidacy is historic. Ms. Baldwin stressed that “breaking through these glass ceilings has a ripple effect.” In other words, her election would — and should — encourage other avowed gays and lesbians to enter high office. She sees herself as the tip of the spear for the LGBT community — a relentless advocate for homosexual issues. She attacks traditional marriage. She led the fight to repeal the ban on gays openly serving in the military. She consistently assaults our Judeo-Christian heritage.
This sounds like a phenomenal candidate. I understand that in the warped mind of the article’s author all of these wonderful things somehow make Bladwin a bad candidate but The Washington Times managed to convince me that Baldwin is sensationally great and should be elected. If even her worst enemies can’t say anything negative about her, then she must be really good.
P.S. I’m still giggling over “postmodern socialist”, “homosexual issues” and “avowed gays and lesbians.” I think I need to subscribe to this paper because it’s too good to pass up.
Clarissa's Blog 
Leave a comment