Somebody came to the blog with a search request of “why some people tenure track and some adjunct.”

The answer: dumb luck.

12 responses to “Tenure Track Versus Adjunct”

  1. David Bellamy Avatar

    There is another possibility some places, including where I work: Continuing non-tenure track. this is abbreviated CNTT, and refers to people who are hired to teach, pretty much exclusively. They teach about twice as many hours a week as tenured or tenure track faculty do. No doubt, after seven years the AAUP will regard them as de facto tenured and treat them accordingly, but they do not have contracts that specify them as tenured. Some have only Master’s degrees, although many have Ph. D.’s. They are much better paid than adjuncts, since they are full time employees with benefits. Some have rank as high as Associate Professor. There could be some Professors among them, but I do not know of any.

    Like

    1. David Gendron Avatar

      I would love to do exactly that…

      Like

  2. charlesrowley Avatar

    For the most part it is not dumb luck. Those who secure tenure track positions are doctorates who have carefully surveyed the market and specialize in expanding and not in contracting fields. They are doctorates who have already published essays from their dissertations in well-cited journals. They are doctorates who are pleasant and agreeable, good conversationalist who do not impose a tax on their colleagues every time they join them for conversation or lunch.

    Like

    1. David Gendron Avatar

      Personally, I see that as a blend of dumb luck, dumb context and timing, and what you just said.

      Like

  3. David Gendron Avatar

    Off-topic:

    We should have a debate on abortion…because some freakazoïd doctors are really murdering babies! http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324767004578485283789264450.html

    Like

  4. David Gendron Avatar

    Off-topic:

    We should have a debate on abortion…because some freakazoïd doctors are really murdering babies in non-abortion procedures! http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324767004578485283789264450.html

    Like

    1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

      Stupid bout of hysteria from the US ultra-conservatives who are dying out and know it. The article is stupid and the person who wrote it is even more stupid. What’s to debate?

      Like

      1. David Gendron Avatar

        We MUST debate the right for women to decide what they do with their body. Women are not able to do that themselves! 😉

        Like

        1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

          Careful or you might attract the crazies. 🙂

          Like

      2. David Gendron Avatar

        Maybe it’s my goal… 😛

        Like

  5. musteryou Avatar

    Unrelated post:

    (Queensland is one of our most regressive states, full of stupid rich people, farmers and misogynists.)

    http://www.goldcoast.com.au/article/2013/05/17/452002_gold-coast-news.html

    Like

Leave a comment

A conservative literary critic and college professor