Victims and Warriors

Published by

Clarissa

January 11, 2014

Right after I wrote the previous post, I received my student evaluations for last semester. And they just killed me. One of the questions we ask is “How could this course be improved?”

And one after another, students answered that it was disruptive and inconvenient to have the instructor change twice within the course. Nothing insults me more than complaints about how much what happened to me inconvenienced somebody. I’m shocked by this need people have to see themselves as victims of somebody else’s tragedy. This complete self-immersion borders on the schizophrenic.

I hate it when people constantly feel aggrieved by absolutely everything in the world. These students had no real complaint to make. Not a single one of them mentioned any real instance of how the change of instructor was disruptive to them. But still they felt victimized.

I despise these fake victims because I’m not one of them.

I’m a warrior.

Rate this:

19 responses to “Victims and Warriors”

el

January 11, 2014

May be, some of them didn’t know why the change happened. Or, didn’t like you demanding more of them than the previous instructor, even if they understand it’s for their own good and not something they can complain about. Wish you mental powers to ignore such as much as possible, such people aren’t worth it.

LikeLike

Reply
Fie Upon This Quiet Life

January 11, 2014

Students can be so unobservant and cruel. What morons.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Michael Blekhman
  
  January 11, 2014
  
  Not only students, I am afraid.
  
  But people like you, Clarissa, will always be the winners.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
  1. Clarissa
    
    January 11, 2014
    
    “But people like you, Clarissa, will always be the winners.”
    
    – And this, my friends, is how a person develops a positive mother complex. 🙂 🙂
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
Sister

January 11, 2014

Assholes and dumbasses.

LikeLike

Reply
David Gendron

January 11, 2014

“students answered that it was disruptive and inconvenient to have the instructor change twice within the course.”

I agree with them, you should have given this course. But, what they don’t know is this situation was better for them than having to be instruct entirely by some other bad teacher.

LikeLike

Reply
David Gendron

January 11, 2014

Corrected:

“students answered that it was disruptive and inconvenient to have the instructor change twice within the course.”

I agree with them, you should not have given this course because of what happened to you. But, what they don’t know is this situation was better for them than having to be instruct entirely by some other bad teacher.

LikeLike

Reply
David Gendron

January 11, 2014

Corrected:
Corrected again:

“students answered that it was disruptive and inconvenient to have the instructor change twice within the course.”

I agree with them, you should not have given this course because of what happened to you. But, what they don’t know is that this situation was better for them than having to be instruct entirely by some other bad teacher.

LikeLike

Reply
Michael Blekhman

January 11, 2014

This person must be a close relative of those ‘victims’.

LikeLike

Reply
1. David Gendron
  
  January 12, 2014
  
  Please re-read my comment. This had nothing to do with Clarissa. Sorry, I don’t speak Ukrainian.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
Shakti

January 11, 2014

I hope the administration isn’t dumb enough to take it as a real complaint on teaching. If the students knew WHY you had to come back, then they just need to have all of the seats.

I’m sorry they are so idiotically cruel.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  January 11, 2014
  
  Oh yes, I will still have to write an explanation of what these complaints meant for my tenure dossier. So this is not over yet.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
  1. Z
    
    January 11, 2014
    
    Good God, do you really?
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
    1. Clarissa
      
      January 11, 2014
      
      “Good God, do you really?”
      
      – Yes, I will have to make graphs reflecting these student evaluations (because the Chair of the tenure committee is in Statistics.) On the graphs, it will be very obvious that there is a drop in the evaluations. We are expected to write narratives explaining all such occurrences.
      
      This Statistics person says he needs graphs because they are easier for him to understand than words. When I become the Chair of the tenure committee, I will require everybody to submit the dossier in Ukrainian because it’s easier for me to understand.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Reply
  2. musteryou
    
    January 11, 2014
    
    Once we as a society get over the idea that the consumer is God, we may be able to treat him for his God complex.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
  3. cliff arroyo
    
    January 12, 2014
    
    Shouldn’t the target be HR (who made the decision regarding the double change of teachers)?
    
    I can imagine that it was disruptive and inconvenient for students to have the double change and they might not realize (despite knowing of your tragedy) that it wasn’t you making the decisions about having to begin the semester and then having to make an unplanned return).
    Those HR decisions were absolutely against the best interests of the students and HR should answer for it.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
    1. Clarissa
      
      January 12, 2014
      
      The HR never answers for anything, either in academia or in business. Oh, the stories I can tell!
      
      LikeLike
      
      Reply
  4. David Gendron
    
    January 12, 2014
    
    Brilliant, Roberto! 🙂
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
2014 in Review | Clarissa's Blog

December 31, 2014

[…] “immigrant” is the only collective identity I value and am proud of). I also shared a very painful thing students did to […]

LikeLike

Reply