It saddens me more than I can express when even good, well-intentioned people don’t stop to consider the import of what they are saying. Here is one example:
For myself, I’m not sure whether Crimea’s decision to leave Ukraine and join Russia was a good one or not.
38% of the people of the Crimea took part in the vote. Less than 1% of Crimean Tatars participated. Those 38% who actually came to the poll voted in some way or other that cannot be ascertained by anybody since no observers were present. The elections were conducted by a government that came to power in 2012 amid massive electoral fraud and was ordered by a President who was elected in 2012 as a result of even more massive fraud and intimidation of voters. I was following Russian news very closely in 2011-12, and the sheer number of reports from independent observers and voters who filmed ballots being destroyed and substituted by the bucketful with fake ballots was overwhelming.
I do not believe that anybody can reasonably conclude from this that the people of the Crimea actually made a “decision to leave Ukraine and join Russia.”
Many people seem so mesmerized by the words “democracy,” “voting” and “election” that they lose all capacity or interest to try to see what hides behind those words. For two decades, Russia kept conducting shamelessly rigged “elections”, while the West exulted in the knowledge that, finally, there was democracy in Russia.
The quoted blogger keeps analyzing Russia in terms that have no relevance to that country:
But it has probably boosted Putin’s popularity, and hence his chances in the next election.
Putin makes his own chances at the elections by rigging them. Hundreds of thousands of people in Russia took to the streets in 2011-12 to protest against rigged elections. It’s OK not to know that but if you don’t, then why not abstain from opining on a region that is of so little interest to you?
And the blogger continues, talking about “such nationalistic considerations as have given rise to the divisions in Ukraine.” The problem is precisely that there are no nationalistic considerations and no divisions in Ukraine. Such considerations and divisions are a myth, peddled by Putin’s propaganda machine to justify the invasion of a peaceful country.
The he goes as far as to suggest that there is “mob rule” in Kiev. We talk daily to people who are currently living in the Eastern part of Ukraine. None of them have witnessed any mob rule. The country is at peace. The democratic process is at work. There are gangs of Russian neo-Nazis and provocateurs who try to provoke peaceful citizens but they have not been very successful.
It’s sad that people don’t stop to consider how hurtful such careless statements can be to others.