I am absolutely appalled and shocked by the ridiculous dishonesty of this article on trigger warnings:
Time was, a “trigger warning” might have indicated that Roy Rogers’ famous horse was approaching. No longer. These days the phrase denotes a growing tendency among North American university student groups to demand that professors provide advance warning about course material – books, films, discussion topics – that might provoke anxiety, panic attacks, or post-traumatic stress disorder in students who have been victims of abuse or assault, or who believe they are the victims of systemic discrimination. A few universities have even begun asking professors to remove said material from their courses.
The students who prevent professors from teaching what we want, who constantly find literature and film to be objectionable, who complain, leave the classroom in a huff, and are mortally insulted by most works of art are not victims of abuse or assault. They are, in the absolute majority of cases, religious students.
I have mentioned many times here on the blog that I can’t find a single film to show in class that would not offend religious sensibilities because, for some strange reason, movies often portray divorce, adultery, sex outside of marriage, profanity, and don’t always end with a wedding.
If we want to discuss the myriad ways in which professors are bullied into not teaching literature and film that offend certain students, then I’m all for it. But for Pete’s sakes, let’s stop being so goddarn hypocritical about it and pretend that it’s some ultra-progressive super-PC group on campus that is censoring free speech.

