I’m discovering a disturbing trend in scholarly writing. One book I read after another (and I read in a variety of fields and languages) starts with something like, “This books aims to court controversy. This study will be very controversial!” And then the book, of course, proceeds to make some extremely trivial and self-evident claims.
What’s disturbing is not only that these books never manage to deliver on their promises of controversy but also the authors’ belief that this sort of warning is necessary whenever a study represents even the most minuscule deviation from “the norm.”

Leave a comment