Some interesting questions about depression:
Depression isn’t new, but its prevalence certainly is.
I wonder why? There has to be some cause, some reason why it affects so many when historically that seems not to have been the case.
My guess is that the narrative of depression – that it is something that just is – is not correct.
Historically, depression is a very new ailment. In the XVIIIth century, it suddenly became fashionable among the European aristocrats to experience bouts of melancholy. In the XIXth century, the representatives of the middle classes who pursued social mobility started to imitate this affliction of the rich and the spoiled.
For most of the human history, all the absolute majority of people did was trying to survive. Not starving or freezing to death and not being murdered were the goals that occupied every waking moment of pretty much everybody with very few exceptions.
In the developed societies today, basic survival is not an issue for anybody. With our basic needs taken care of, we can pursue goals of a higher order. We can now afford to pay attention to our emotional states, our feelings, our moods. Depression is an ailment of a rich, mostly content society, and that’s why it couldn’t have become prevalent at any other moment in history.

Leave a comment