. . . is that she’s only been in politics from 2001 to February of 2013. And that’s a very short time for a politician to mature. Besides, it’s not like she’s known for any phenomenal achievements either as a senator or as Secretary of State.
Yes, I know there is nobody else but that doesn’t mean we should not discuss the limitations of the existing candidate.
That’s interesting. I take it to mean that “in politics” means “held elected office or non ceremonial position at any level?
LikeLike
Yes, but were you expecting an Adlai Stevenson out of someone who painted the colours in the right numbers through her career?
Because that’s essentially what people have to recommend her: she’s more than just a known quantity, she’s a predictable known quantity …
LikeLike
A conservative literary critic and college professor
Clarissa's Blog 
Leave a comment