Vic Crain raises an important issue:
“I really don’t understand why people so firmly resist the idea that economics, not race, is the fundamental dimension of discrimination.”
This happens because there were concerted and extremely successful efforts to substitute the terminology of class war with the terminology of inherent, inborn, inescapable identities.
The goal was to support the “end of history” line of thought that goes as follows:
the only real divisions among humans are those of “identities”
⇓
“identities” are the source of all problems that we experience today
⇓
“identities” are “hard-wired” and can’t be changed
=
ergo, nothing can be changed and we live in the best of all possible worlds.
It’s a nifty little trick of manipulation aimed at ensuring that everybody is so dedicated to the endless repetition of trivialities (without which no identity can exist) that economic exploitation does not even get mentioned.
As the great Spanish writer Rafael Chirbes observes, the word “class” is used today solely to signal that one is not adhering to the values of consumerism well enough. We all know what “She has so much class!” and “What a classy guy!” mean, don’t we? These expressions point to the sad, empty space where the concept of class as a social and economic category used to sit.

