And now I finally read this article on Trump and women that everybody is talking about. What a ridiculous, pathetic piece of tabloid garbage this article is. There is nothing in it but a collection of entirely anodyne, boring anecdotes that have zero meaning whatsoever. Gosh, one could easily find much juicier stories about me, if they wanted to. Ooooh, he told somebody she must love candy, what a horrible insult! Let’s all clutch our pearls on cue. What rot!

If anything, this article will attract people to Trump because the only conclusion one can draw is that if this is the extent of Trump’s “sexism”, then what are we all even talking about?

Are people not noticing how stupid this all is? They are trying to discredit Trump by revealing that back in 1990 he asked somebody to wear a swimsuit by the poolside. That evildoer.

13 responses to “The Stupid Article on Trump and Women”

  1. Dreidel Avatar
    Dreidel

    Have you seen a copy of the printed New York Times newspaper? That article ran as HEADLINE NEWS on the front page.

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      Yes, I have it. It’s beyond ridiculous. I was prepared for shocking revelations only to find stories about how he praised his mother for being understanding of his father’s long work hours. It’s embarrassing they’d print something like this.

      Like

  2. Ben Avatar
    Ben

    I’d have thought most people would be talking about the rape accusation, especially since it’s not the only one that’s been made against Trump.

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      This is old news, though. This was all discussed back in the summer, and the ex-wife said she didn’t mean it, it was just a way of speaking. Who knows what their marital games were like, especially if she now says it’s all good.

      Like

  3. Shakti Avatar
    Shakti

    Zero meaning? Not really.

    But it doesn’t really add any new information to what we know of Trump. We already know he’s a loudmouth braggart who thinks the hotness of the women around him reflects on him, and comments accordingly. If that didn’t bother you before, why would it now?

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      If he were a kind, gentle, super respectful ultra feminist, that would not make him in the least bit more qualified to be president. He’s unqualified not because he’s an unpleasant fellow but because, as Obama said the other day, he doesn’t know anything about anything.

      Like

      1. Shakti Avatar
        Shakti

        True.

        But being a living example of Dunning-Kruger isn’t a disqualification to be POTUS in many people’s eyes; it’s a bona fide asset.

        Like

        1. Clarissa Avatar

          Exactly! This article will only attract more fans. 😦

          Like

  4. el Avatar
    el

    Interesting take RE Trump:

    О демонстративном потреблении, потлаче, налогах и Дональде Трампе
    http://scholar-vit.livejournal.com/472263.html

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      Great post. I agree completely.

      Like

    2. Dreidel Avatar
      Dreidel

      Yeah, interesting theory — that Trump won’t release his tax information because he’s not nearly as rich as he pretends, and thus his whole public persona is a fraud.

      Like

      1. Clarissa Avatar

        Ah, you are a secret speaker of Russian. 🙂

        Like

        1. Dreidel Avatar
          Dreidel

          Yeah, the KGB taught me when I was stationed in Germany!

          Actually, the Google “translate” feature worked remarkably well for that article (sometimes its automatic translations are gibberish).

          Like

Leave a comment