So all of this ridiculous blethering about the evil nature of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and some completely idiotic fantasies about her collusion with Hillary led to. . . support for a Trump-like anti-semitic opponent of the Iran deal?
Yes, nothing sexist here at all. Not even remotely.
Clarissa's Blog 
Okay I read the linked article and I am not sure how he is anti-Semitic. His opposition to the Iran deal appears to be connected to support of Israel. It did say he volunteered on a kibbutz. But, most of the article is on how he is a university professor.
LikeLike
The mention of the stepfather is well in line with the traditional “some of my best friends are” line.
LikeLike
It isn’t sexist to call Debbie Wasserman Schultz what she is: a totally in-the-tank-for Hillary toady who has repeatedly abused her officially-neutral position to rig the primary system in Hillary’s favor.
She (Schultz) isn’t going away, though. The Democrats are stuck with Hillary as their nominee, and Bernie’s forces don’t have enough power to oust Hillary’s BFF.
LikeLike
This is all mythology with no basis in reality. Let’s not echo Bernie-paranoia. We’ve had enough of it in this cycle.
LikeLike
Which of my paragraphs are mythology — the first or the second? 🙂
LikeLike
Both. Bernie’s losing has nothing to do with Wasserman. He’s losing because he refuses to learn or get informed. And people are noticing.
LikeLike