Feminists would be well-advised to ease up on pop culture navel-gazing and corporate pseudo-feminist drivel like Lean In. They need to shift their central focus from the glass ceiling to the sticky floor, which, after all, is the place where most women dwell. A feminism that delivers for working-class women by addressing their material needs could expand feminism’s base and bring about a much-needed feminist revival. A feminism that delivers for working-class women by addressing their material needs could radically expand feminism’s base.
I’m all for a reduction in navel gazing but I don’t get this article at all. If reproductive freedom, free college, cheaper daycare, maternity leave, higher minimum wage, a chance to preserve social security and Medicare, cheaper healthcare are not the policies that would help working class women, then what is? Enough empty blabber, let’s talk specifics. What did Trump offer working class women that Hillary didn’t?
I’m so tired of this “Trump is the revenge of the dispossessed” narrative.
Leave a comment