
I have explained at great length why the formula “XYZ entity has a right to ABC action” is shallow and childish. I have explained that it holds no interest to me by virtue of its superficiality.
There are only two possibilities why you would want to keep trying to engage me in a conversation that I clearly and repeatedly dismissed as being too primitive for my liking:
A. You do not have the intellectual capacity to understand my explanations.
B. You are trolling.
You have my sympathy whatever the option closest to the truth.
To people who can understand, I want to propose an exercise. Whenever you start formulating a thought about rights, try to see if you can express your idea without using this word. “Rights” has become a lazy substitute for an amalgamation of concepts that nobody wants to untangle because there are inconvenient things hiding in there.
If you want to explore this further, you can’t do any better than reading Christopher Caldwell’s The Age of Entitlement. He talks about how the spread of invented “rights” eviscerated the US Constitution. Or at least, read this post from when I was talking about Caldwell incessantly. We do not need to invent the wheel when others have done it a long time ago.

Leave a comment