Newspeak

So do you know the new term for layoffs?

Subtractive change.

And if you are against layoffs or eliminating tenure lines, that means you are “guilty of systemic bias against subtractive change.”

This terminology was invented in academia, so it will take a little bit of time to become widespread.

Austerity has found a new disguise.

17 responses to “Newspeak”

  1. methylethyl Avatar

    I saw a really funny one today:

    “underconsumption”

    As a word for frugality.

    https://theconversation.com/understanding-underconsumption-core-how-a-new-trend-is-challenging-consumer-culture-235417?utm_source=pocket-newtab-en-us

    Cannot. Stop. Laughing. Whenever I see it.

    Underconsumption.

    It’s like undernourishment, or underperformance or something.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. methylethyl Avatar

      –can’t tell what’s funnier there, the term itself, or the fact that they think there’s a need for an article on it, to help the perplexed understand. The whole thing breaks my brain a little. Sound of one hand clapping. Understanding underconsumption. Core.

      Like

    2. Clarissa Avatar

      At first I thought it was a form of tuberculosis.

      Wow, I added two new words to my vocabulary today, and both are stupid.

      Like

  2. TomW Avatar
    TomW

    I haven’t heard that one yet, but we did have an administrator a couple of years ago who kept going around saying that our university’s biggest problem was that we kept adding programs and never got rid of any. The administrator in question was not entirely wrong about that, but I don’t think agreed with most of their judgements about what needed to be gotten rid of.

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      This new term is being pioneered by the LGBTQUAA+ Leadership Program at Stanford in partnership with their Business School. What LGBTQUAA have to do with it I’m still not certain.

      Like

      1. methylethyl Avatar

        LGBTQUAA+

        How do you pronounce that?

        Like

        1. methylethyl Avatar

          …is it like, “leg-butt-quay-plus”, do we spell out all the letters “ell-gee-bee-tee-cue-you-ay-ay-plus”?

          Where did the I go? I feel like there used to be an I. Did the Is get canceled?

          It keeps getting longer and evolving, and seems to exist to be unwieldy in both conversation and writing, as a complicated and obtuse way of saying “not straight”. We could just shortcut that and start calling them Crooked. But since they wanna be obtuse and pompous, I think it’d be best if we used military radio letters whenever we have to refer to the thing out loud, for maximum ridiculousness: “Lima-Golf-Bravo-Tango-Quebec-Uniform-Alpha-Alpha-Plus”?

          The Lima-Golf-Bravo-Tango-Quebec-Uniform-Alpha-Alpha-Plus Leadership program at Stanford has a certain ring to it…

          Like

          1. Clarissa Avatar

            It’s supposed to be spelled. People do it with a completely straight face, no pun intended. El-gee-bee-tee… And so on into Infinity.

            Like

            1. methylethyl Avatar

              Next year it’s gonna have fifty letters, and the corporate and academic worlds will grind to a halt because nobody can escape meetings in under five hours, due to the recitation of the sacred letter sequence. They will then hire ceremonial “Ellgees”– brightly-robed functionaries whose sole job is to intone the sacred letters quietly and perpetually in a low drone, so that everybody else can get on with their lives, having replaced the seqence with a hand gesture, in much the same way as the early church’s six-hour liturgy was shortened by having the priest say some of the longer prayers *at the same time* as everybody was singing.

              Ten years later, the hand gesture will have replaced the “bird” as the universally-understood method of insulting people who cut you off in traffic.

              Liked by 1 person

          2.  Avatar
            Anonymous

            “Where did the I go? I feel like there used to be an I. Did the Is get canceled?”

            Yeah, I noticed that, too. Somebody’s job at Stanford is in jeopardy because they just cruelly marginalized all the INTERSEX students on their campus. At least they were woke enough not to ruin the program by including any H (for heterosexual) or N (for normal) people in it.

            Dreidel

            (I didn’t put the double underline that appears under the word “woke” [or at least appears on my screen]. WordPress apparently considers it a misspelling of “awake.”)

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Clarissa Avatar

              I was actually just wondering where the I went.

              And these are the people who are calling us weird.

              Like

              1. methylethyl Avatar

                You’d think if they were going to drop one, it’d be the B, since it’s now heresy to admit there are only two sexes, but to be “bisexual” is by nature to embrace the idea of a sexual binary. All the cool kids these days are calling themselves “pansexual” which I guess is just a way of saying you’ll f**k anything.

                Liked by 1 person

              2. methylethyl Avatar

                (it is of course playacting: every one of the “pansexual” kids I know has a dating type so specific it includes not just bio gender, but also height, hair color, skin tone, and BMI)

                Liked by 1 person

  3. Stringer Bell Avatar
    Stringer Bell

    Remember the whole discourse about why homeless is an offensive term, which was purged in favor of unhoused? I never got that one.

    Like

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      “homeless is an offensive term, which was purged in favor of unhoused”

      Are you old enough to remember the terms “hobo” and “bum”?

      Dreidel

      Liked by 1 person

    2. methylethyl Avatar

      Nobody here calls them homeless anymore.

      Now they’re just “meth zombies”.

      Like

  4. mosckerr Avatar

    Sounds like: “baffle me with bs”. :)))

    Like

Leave a comment