I took a peek at the leftist social media, and weird things are going on there. Everybody is discussing a woman who died because she couldn’t get an abortion. Even though she did have an abortion. And died as a result of the abortion. But somehow her very tragic death from an abortion is still evidence that she died because she couldn’t get an abortion. Which she did get.
I left 5 minutes into the experiment because that’s too much crazy.
The hospital wouldn’t care for her in the aftermath of the abortion, because of Trump’s Supreme Court ruling and states’ callous laws. Aside from that, yes, leftist bad.
LikeLike
The state law, which was permitted by the Suprem Court ruling ruling banned it. The doctors dithered, worrying that they would go to jail for doing it if her life wasn’t in imment risk. So they waited until there was immmenent risk and then waited past that point, because imminent risk is a subjective judgement. The result was a dead woman. If the law was different, they wouldn’t have dithered.
LikeLike
” doctors dithered, worrying that they would go to jail
Similar cases in Poland where doctor hesitance to make judgement calls resulted in dead women. After that, the government that pushed through toughening the laws said ‘oh that’s not what we meant!’ and totally lost the support of most people under 40….
LikeLike
I also have to mention, because maybe people don’t know, D&C is used daily for miscarriage. I’ve held friends’ hands over this terrible experience several times. If D&C were made illegal (which it wasn’t), there’s be a pile of dead bodies.
Something happened here and I hope it gets investigated.
LikeLike
In Georgia, D&C seems to be legal for miscarriages only. From this article – https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death:
“Take the language in Georgia’s supposed lifesaving exceptions.
It prohibits doctors from using any instrument “with the purpose of terminating a pregnancy.” While removing fetal tissue is not terminating a pregnancy, medically speaking, the law only specifies it’s not considered an abortion to remove “a dead unborn child” that resulted from a “spontaneous abortion” defined as “naturally occurring” from a miscarriage or a stillbirth.
Thurman had told doctors her miscarriage was not spontaneous — it was the result of taking pills to terminate her pregnancy.”
LikeLike
I started reading the article, got to this part “Some have been forced to continue high-risk pregnancies that threatened their lives” and understandably quit reading after that. In 2013 I was forced to continue a high-risk pregnancy in pro-abortion Illinois that resulted in the death of my child. In 2016, I was given a C-section at 36 weeks in the much more conservative Missouri and that saved my child’s life.
This is a real, terrible issue that’s being used for political gain by dishonest people.
LikeLike
Thank you for putting a nickname in the name box, though. I really appreciate it.
LikeLike
I know that this is the mythology that arose around the death. But it’s clearly untrue. And because of the hysteria and the need to politicize, nobody will investigate what happened.
We are robbing ourselves in order to experience the joys of political partisanship.
LikeLike
Bunk. The revocation of Roe vs. Wade has absolutely everything to do with the Supreme Court. Silly reactionary fool.
LikeLike
A conservative literary critic and college professor
Clarissa's Blog 
Leave a comment