
No, because they weren’t defeated. The US started paying reparations to Russia immediately after the collapse of the USSR. The Budapest Memorandum disarmed Russia’s neighbors and positioned it to start invading the now utterly defenseless neighboring countries. Nothing was asked for in return. There was no accountability, no Nuremberg trials, nobody even had to lose their job. How is it losing if the side that supposedly lost the conflict immediately proceeds to feed you, arm you, and humor you in every way possible?
The first time I even heard that the USSR supposedly lost the Cold War was when I arrived in Canada. I found it hilarious then, and I find it even more hilarious now. Russia duped the West by temporarily removing the red banners and then using Western resources to wage the exact same war on the West but much more aggressively.
Compare this to when Germany lost WWII. That was real losing. Germany officially capitulated, it was split in two, Nuremberg trials were held, the denazification campaign took place. That’s how you lose a war. But if after “losing” you get coddled, given payouts, and armed against your neighbors, in what sense is that losing?




