Turns out that South Korea is investing a lot of money into promoting the study of Korean history and culture in Spanish universities. Probably elsewhere too, because if they only did it in Spain, that would be a little random.

As a result, there are several presentations at this conference about South Korea. These presentations stick out like sore thumbs because they are in no way related to everything else that is done at the conference. There is a talk titled “Issues of Identity in the Literature of Spain, Argentina, Ecuador, and South Korea.” There are several students who are defending doctoral dissertations on Korea at the Department of Philology of the University of Salamanca. What they’re going to do with these dissertations after defending them is unclear. But the humanities are severely underfunded in Spain, and who can blame people for jumping at an opportunity to get funding?

South Koreans should be commended for investing money in promoting their culture overseas. This is what a strong national government does. Yes, the presentations at this conference sound a little random. But that’s okay. The important thing is to get people used to the idea that your culture is something worth researching and talking about.

Ukrainians constantly complain that nobody knows that Ukrainian literature and culture exist. But these complaints ring hollow. In the 30 years of pre-war independence nothing whatsoever was done to promote the study of Ukrainian culture overseas.

7 responses to “South Korea and the Nation-state”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    But the humanities are severely underfunded in Spain… So.

    One could try:

    “But Spainiards can’t afford to fund indigent academics in the humanities, so…”

    Computer mode is easiest:

    But only fraction of the limited funds available to Spainish academics in their university system goes to the humanities department…

    One can perceive how Miss Clarissa does it, though, after the trick is done: educational.

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      The AI bot is back. Yay.

      Like

  2. cliff arroyo Avatar

    “What they’re going to do with these dissertations after defending them is unclear”

    In Poland, Skorea had a lot of PR/funding initiatives in the 1990s as it was also investing in the country’s manufacturing sector (still in shambles after communism) and a few years later funding for programs to study the language. Around the same time for unrelated reasons my late former boss wandered into the Embassy in Warsaw (basically cold calling) and left with the beginnings of exchange programs and teacher support which became the biggest (I think) Korean studies program in the country and one of our calling cards.

    The SKorean strategy does seem to be to support academic humanities as a way to raise the country’s profile and credibility as an investor.

    Like

  3.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    My question is this. They have a massive looming crisis on their hands. A crisis that is now, not a decade in the future. So why are they devoting all these resources to ….. nevermind I just figured it out.

    So South Korea is having an absolute disaster in terms of replacement of its population. It is so bad over there, that it makes almost every other nation that is in decline look positive by comparison. I believe its replacement rate is a 0.6 to 0.8 when you need 2.1 as a baseline.

    I suspect they they are pouring all these funds to attempt to attract westerners to immigrate to South Korea to bolster their failing population numbers. After all it is easier to simply bring in replacements than try to fix what your policies broke in the first place. And if there is one thing all politicians share, its that non of them ever want to admit they cause an issue. Especially one as bad as this.

    • – W

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      I thought I read somewhere recently that they’ve been turning it around and improving fertility. Did I imagine this? I’m traveling, and the time zone change might be confusing me.

      Like

      1.  Avatar
        Anonymous

        Its possible, but replacement rate isn’t really something you can turn around in a year. Its one of those time lagging type things. As in it needs to have gone up for about 5 to 10 years without dropping back down to really mean anything. Also you would need to trust that the numbers being mentioned were not being fluffed up by immigrants being added in to make it look better.

        So for instance lets say that the rate was at 1.0 Now while people tend to live about 80 years (not including meds extending life, or accidents ending life early.) And of those 80 years, you typically have a fertility window of 8 to 40. That gets reduced further due to society morals, and not wanting a geriatric pregnancy. So call it 16 to 32. Yes I am aware that a lot of women have kids later, but I am looking at the time for the best chance for the mother (16 and above) and the kid (32 and below).

        So you have roughly a 16 year window for a generation to reproduce. Now (IF) the replacement rate is below 2.1 for that 16 years. Lets say it is sitting at 1.5 Then the generation born from Call it Gen. X will be 1/4th smaller than Gen X itself. Which means that later than Gen. Call it Gen. Y would need 2.6 kids to get the population back to where their (Gen. Y) population should have started. 2.0 to replace it, 0.5 to replace the missing, 0.1 to increase it.

        In effect for this to take place, the rate would need to be 2.1 for Gen X for 16 years in a row to effect their whole generation, or 2.6 for Gen. Y to effect their whole generation. Now while there are constantly people having kids, there are effectively large bursts every 20 years that create generations. If one of these has a below replacement rate for its entire fertility window, it does damage to future generations, not just the next generation.

        So even if South Korea states the birth rate is up. Which I will state for the record I would not believe for a second, as they have not fixed any of the issues causing the collapse of the birth rate. So why would it have suddenly gone up. Even if it had, it would be for a single year of that 16 year window. You would need it back up to 2.1 for the entire 16 years. Or at the very least 2.0 for complete replacement. Anything short of that (16 years in total and 2.0 for all 16 years) and it will do effectively nothing.

        This problem has been brewing now for decades. It has only recently gotten the spotlight because it can no longer be hid. But it did not start yesterday, and it cannot be fixed tomorrow.

        • – W

        Like

  4. Demotrash Avatar
    Demotrash

    I know that SK made a concerted effort to promote their music and cultural products to an international audience. Did not realize this extended into academia, but it doesn’t surprise me.

    Like

Leave a comment