Much of Latin American literature is about the conflict between civilization and barbarity. If you go to college to study Hispanic literature, you will have it drilled into your head for years that, in this confrontation, barbarity is yippee-doodle, hey-ho fantastic while civilization is evil and oppressive. That this is taught by college professors of literature, whose entire existence is only possible under conditions of an extremely developed civilization, at no point strikes the proponents of the theory as paradoxical.

Cultures that have not achieved as much as others on the civilizational path are going to devalue civilization as boring, oppressive, and unnatural. That’s not in the least unusual or unexpected. What’s bizarre is that high achievers on the civilizational journey allow themselves to be duped into being ashamed of their great achievements.

2 responses to “Civilization and Barbarity”

  1. PaulS Avatar
    PaulS

    In SA, white poverty was a key problem where people could be poor despite being from a superior civilization.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Commission_of_Investigation_on_the_Poor_White_Question_in_South_Africa

    The apartheid relied on giving privileged jobs to these poor white people generally refered to as the van der Merwes, the dim-witted enforcers of the .

    https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/district-9-2009

    After the assassination of their Dr. Evil, they began rolling back his diabolical policies.

    https://time.com/archive/6874158/south-africa-a-touch-of-sweet-reasonableness/

    Like

  2. oldcowboy3 Avatar
    oldcowboy3

    Hmmm, well Kid, Rousseau with his Noble Savage wetdream clearly never ran into any Indian reserves ;-D

    Like

Leave a Reply