I never take people’s posts in full, but I had to take this one. I hope the author doesn’t mind:
Rate this:
Share this:
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Okay, so the same thing should be applied to cops.
LikeLike
Love this. Thanks for linking to it!
And @David: I have a problem with cops being armed myself. But surely you can understand that it is far far better to limit weapons access to a small, regulated, and trained group of professionals than it is to allow an unregulated flood of highly lethal weapons?
LikeLike
// I have a problem with cops being armed myself
Should they go against armed criminals or even somebody killing others with a knife weaponless? A knife is very dangerous too, let alone guns. Instead of cops, lets rename them into suicide corps.
LikeLike
Oh I think there are other ways that the police can be protected: stun guns, tranquilizers, billy clubs. I actually think that more harm than good comes out of an armed police force. Still, I’m a realist and know that the US will never disarm our police. I just believe in limitng access to weapons as much as possible. 🙂
LikeLike