What I really hate is when people substitute analysis with clumsy attempts to fit reality into facile pseudo-intellectual categories. For instance, a colleague declared that the reason why certain departments and programs within a university are considered more important than others is gender-based. Engineering has the majority of male students and professors, so it ranks higher than Sociology and Education, which are almost 100% female.
When she offered this idea to the group, people embraced it avidly. Nobody wants to tell Sociology and Education that they don’t do anything, their fields are a useless waste of time (I mean, there are now fields like “Educational Leadership”, which boggles the mind with its uselessness), so it’s easier to agree with these pseudo-feminist bouts of silliness.
Of course, what we all knew but didn’t want to say to avoid upsetting the Sociologists is that, at our university, the most important program of all whose needs always trump everybody else’s is our highly accredited School of Nursing. And I’m yet to see a single male in that program. One male student I knew applied but was rejected because his grades in biology were not outstanding.
It is obvious to everybody but the most obtuse that a program where people learn to tend to the sick will matter more than a program where people shoot the breeze about how to be educational leaders, whatever that even is. Let’s not hide from that reality behind empty pseudo-feminist slogans.

