Women Are Stupid, Cont’d

Published by

Clarissa

August 12, 2015

A fresh episode in the “Women Are Stupid” story that has been developing for as long as it became fashionable for women to attach themselves to a single worthless pair of pants and debase themselves for its sake:

Lottery winner spends $9m on bailing out fiancee accused of heroin trafficking.

Of course, for 9 million bucks this idiot could have bought herself a battalion of fresh, juicy drug dealers to cater to her every whim. But no, within consumer mentality, women only see themselves as goods, never as purchasers.

Rate this:

10 responses to “Women Are Stupid, Cont’d”

Dreidel

August 12, 2015

Yeah, the woman isn’t too bright, but the author of the linked article isn’t a very good reporter.

The woman didn’t “spend” (as in “pay for,” meaning the money is gone forever in exchange for goods or services) the $9 million. She put the $$ up as a bail bond, which means that she gets the money back when her boyfriend shows up for trial. Big difference.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  August 12, 2015
  
  She already lost 3 million because the deadbeat violated the previous bail conditions. This is the second bail payment after he lost her the first one.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
  1. Dreidel
    
    August 12, 2015
    
    Are you sure? The various articles say that her boyfriend was arrested again after he “violated the terms of his first arrest agreement,” but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the bail was forfeited. A bail bond only guarantees that a defendant will show up on a certain court date — it isn’t contingent on his behavior in the meantime.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
    1. Clarissa
      
      August 12, 2015
      
      The article is poorly written, you’re right. But I’m guessing that since the new bail is twice as big as the first one, this has got to mean that the first one we thought away.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Reply
      1. Dreidel
        
        August 12, 2015
        
        Or maybe the judge just wanted to see how stupid the defendant’s girlfriend actually could be. 🙂
        
        LikeLike
        
        Reply
        
        Clarissa
        
        August 12, 2015
        
        It’s possible that the entire court is making bets on how far she will go. 🙂
        
        LikeLike
        
        Reply
Arzee

August 12, 2015

As well, if the accused drug dealer is a male, as i think is the case, then it should be fiance, (one e), not fiancee. Journalism these days!

LikeLike

Reply
Shakti

August 12, 2015

I want to know why the guy’s bail was so high($3 million) the first time. Did they set it before she won the lottery?

The article doesn’t say if he’s the father of any of her children.

Love is blind and stupid.

Before the lottery win she was working 2 menial jobs to support 4 children, one of whom has cerebral palsy.

I’ll just direct you to the charts here and here. Maybe her self perception hadn’t shifted yet?

She should be careful that he doesn’t try to implicate her. People often do that to avoid prison/serve a smaller sentence.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  August 12, 2015
  
  What really gets me is that this silly tool has got to be aware that had this fellow won millions in a lottery, he’d be kicking her on her ass and purchasing a crowd of fresh, younger things.
  
  It’s pathetic that not even a multimillion fortune helps women stop being subservient, pathetic victims. This is where feminism’s hardest work lies: inside the heads of these brainwashed idiots.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
Jones

August 13, 2015

This could make a fantastic documentary …

“Bailing Out Bad” 🙂

LikeLike

Reply