Women Are Stupid, Cont’d

A fresh episode in the “Women Are Stupid” story that has been developing for as long as it became fashionable for women to attach themselves to a single worthless pair of pants and debase themselves for its sake:

Lottery winner spends $9m on bailing out fiancee accused of heroin trafficking.

Of course, for 9 million bucks this idiot could have bought herself a battalion of fresh, juicy drug dealers to cater to her every whim. But no, within consumer mentality, women only see themselves as goods, never as purchasers.

10 thoughts on “Women Are Stupid, Cont’d

  1. Yeah, the woman isn’t too bright, but the author of the linked article isn’t a very good reporter.

    The woman didn’t “spend” (as in “pay for,” meaning the money is gone forever in exchange for goods or services) the $9 million. She put the $$ up as a bail bond, which means that she gets the money back when her boyfriend shows up for trial. Big difference.

    Like

    1. She already lost 3 million because the deadbeat violated the previous bail conditions. This is the second bail payment after he lost her the first one.

      Like

      1. Are you sure? The various articles say that her boyfriend was arrested again after he “violated the terms of his first arrest agreement,” but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the bail was forfeited. A bail bond only guarantees that a defendant will show up on a certain court date — it isn’t contingent on his behavior in the meantime.

        Like

        1. The article is poorly written, you’re right. But I’m guessing that since the new bail is twice as big as the first one, this has got to mean that the first one we thought away.

          Like

  2. As well, if the accused drug dealer is a male, as i think is the case, then it should be fiance, (one e), not fiancee. Journalism these days!

    Like

  3. I want to know why the guy’s bail was so high($3 million) the first time. Did they set it before she won the lottery?

    The article doesn’t say if he’s the father of any of her children.

    Love is blind and stupid.

    Before the lottery win she was working 2 menial jobs to support 4 children, one of whom has cerebral palsy.

    I’ll just direct you to the charts here and here. Maybe her self perception hadn’t shifted yet?

    She should be careful that he doesn’t try to implicate her. People often do that to avoid prison/serve a smaller sentence.

    Like

    1. What really gets me is that this silly tool has got to be aware that had this fellow won millions in a lottery, he’d be kicking her on her ass and purchasing a crowd of fresh, younger things.

      It’s pathetic that not even a multimillion fortune helps women stop being subservient, pathetic victims. This is where feminism’s hardest work lies: inside the heads of these brainwashed idiots.

      Like

Leave a reply to Arzee Cancel reply