Another Republican Debate

Published by

Clarissa

October 28, 2015

Do we really need another Republican debate? Are things still not clear for somebody?

I can’t promise I’ll watch very faithfully but I’ll have the TV on, and I’ll post interesting observations if I have them. Feel free to comment or vent about the insanity of such a long electoral cycle.

8:09 – the debate was on mute but then I turned on the sound and. . . heard Rubio roll his darned boring line about his mother, the maid AGAIN. It’s like he’s got nothing else at all to say, ever.

8:14 – Cruz talks about “the plight of working women.” Where do these antideluvian reptilians come from?

8:23 – Rubio believes that H1B immigrants can be substituted with Americans who get vocational training in high schools. What an irredeemable idiot.

8:26 – even Trump is more informed on H1B than Rubio.

8:27 – Rubio is now pouting over the media’s love of Hillary. What a whiny little Momma’s boy.

8:46 – why does Rubio keep yakking so much in this debate? Is he the next great hope of the GOP? Because if so, then oh, Lordy.

8:48 – Trump wants his employees to bring guns to work because ISIS. Reason has left the building. Go home, folks, you’ve lost this round already.

8:52 – Fiorina is a very stupid woman. Did she get any education at all?

What a disappointing cast of characters. Nobody seems to inhabit reality.

Rate this:

23 responses to “Another Republican Debate”

Stringer Bell

October 28, 2015

‘What is your biggest weakness’ is such a bullshit interview question that stupid businesses love to ask.

Of course CNBC leads with that question.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  True! That’s how you know a stupid employer or recruiter.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
2. Shakti
  
  October 29, 2015
  
  What insight do people actually think they gain by asking such a question?
  Seriously?
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
  1. Clarissa
    
    October 29, 2015
    
    The point of such a question during a job interview is mild workplace bullying. The candidate begins to squirm, trying to come up with an answer, and you enjoy seeing them feel like an idiot.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
Dreidel

October 28, 2015

At least this debate will be relatively short, since CNBC caved in to Trump’s and Carson’s demand for a time limit.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  As I said, Trump is a sprinter, not a marathoner.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
Vic Crain

October 28, 2015

The length of the election cycle is in the same category of issues as campaign finance reform, disclosure of advertising sponsors, and truth in advertising. Theodore Roosevelt argued that business money should be barred from politics; think anybody except Sanders would say that today? The public is complacent, and most politicians are content to line their pockets, so nothing has been done to fix an obvious, corrupt mess.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Dreidel
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  “Theodore Roosevelt argued that business money should be barred from politics; think anybody except Sanders would say that today?”
  
  Nobody who expects to have a chance of getting elected — which Sanders doesn’t. (The ungrammatical dependent clause refers to his chances, not his expectations).
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
2. Clarissa
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  When I hear the things these candidates have to say about the economy, my hair stands on end. The ignorance is shocking.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
Dreidel

October 28, 2015

“Cruz talks about ‘the plight of working women.’ Where do these antideluvian reptilians come from?”

They were all born of women, just like you and me.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  I’m starting to wonder, though. Might genetic experiments have achieved more than we know?
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
Dreidel

October 28, 2015

Trump is definitely no Republican — the hypocrite just came out against super PACs.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  Are you in favor of them? I only ever heard bad things but I’m not fully sure what they are.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
  1. Dreidel
    
    October 28, 2015
    
    “Are you in favor of them?”
    
    Yes. I agree with the Supreme Court that contributing money to the political process is protected free speech, and this right shouldn’t be limited.
    
    A “super Political Action Committee” is an organization that accepts donations from individuals, corporations, and unions and spends the money in support of a political party or in ads for or against specific candidates. The PAC can’t give money directly to any candidate.
    
    The “Citizens United” decision removed the cap that individuals could contribute (it was $2,500), and also allowed corporations and unions to make donations.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
    1. Vic Crain
      
      October 28, 2015
      
      The first fraud comes in treating corporations as people and assigning them the same rights that a human has. That’s a fiction that’s gone too far.
      
      The second fraud comes in taking a very narrow definition of campaign contribution. If I write a check for a candidate, that’s a contribution. If I fund a million dollar ad campaign for the benefit of the same candidate, that’s not a contribution and I can set up a front so that no one really knows who funded the campaign. That’s how the Kochs work.
      
      If we can’t get rid of PACs, we should be able to levy income tax on every dollar they suck up. Now that would help with the deficit and the economy.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Reply
      1. Clarissa
        
        October 28, 2015
        
        Good point on the income tax. If corporations are people, let’s tax them like we would people.
        
        LikeLike
        
        Reply
        
        Dreidel
        
        October 28, 2015
        
        “Good point on the income tax. If corporations are people, let’s tax them like we would people.”
        
        I agree: Tax them at the rate that an intelligent, pro-business capitalist government should tax already-taxed secondary income like capital gains, dividends, and inheritance — at ZERO percent.
        
        LikeLike
        
        Reply
        
        Clarissa
        
        October 28, 2015
        
        If it’s already taxed, then it’s not inheritance. If transferred money isn’t taxed, then salaries or business profits can’t be taxed either.
        
        LikeLike
Dreidel

October 28, 2015

“Fiorina is a very stupid woman. Did she get any education at all?”

She has a BA from Stanford University.Her major was in “medieval history and philosophy,” which I’ll admit is about as worthless as “women’s studies” or basket weaving.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Clarissa
  
  October 28, 2015
  
  Maybe she was one of those sorority chicks who pass just for showing up.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
  1. Dreidel
    
    October 28, 2015
    
    She also has a master of science in management from Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management and an MBA from the University of Maryland. (Not interesting information, I know — but to be fair, she did complete some postgraduate business studies.)
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
    1. Clarissa
      
      October 28, 2015
      
      Ah, so that’s the problem. Management degrees do tend to mess with people.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Reply
Dreidel

October 28, 2015

“If transferred money isn’t taxed, then salaries or business profits can’t be taxed either.”

Hey, salaries are wages. Inheritance is CHARITY to one’s heirs. The U.S. tax code has different rules that specifically encourage opening your heart and donating to charity.

LikeLike

Reply