Purdue Pharma marketed Oxycontin as non-addictive, lying to doctors and consumers and saying that it couldn’t generate addiction because it wasn’t giving users a high. What I find incomprehensible is how people could trust these lies more than the evidence provided by their own bodies.
I took Oxy a couple of times, long before I read Dreamland, heard about the opiate epidemic, or even knew Oxy was an opiate. I took a minuscule dosage and discovered that the drug was producing an immediate and noticeable high followed after a while by a very clear crash.
And I got freaked out like hell and stopped taking the drug.
I’m sure there are people who don’t get an Oxy high. But those are not the ones who are likely to get addicted anyway. The ones who will get addicted because that’s how their brain is set up do feel the high because without it they wouldn’t become addicts.
So the (entirely rhetorical) question I have is how alienated must one be from one’s own body to disregard what is an obvious sign of great danger and continue taking the drug all the way into a full-blown heroin addiction? People must see themselves as infants whose bodily functions are a responsibility of an adult.
After a baby turns 1 year old, its parents begin to socialize it into taking control of its bodily functions. But it seems like too many people were never informed that the ultimate responsibility for their bodies is their own.

Leave a comment