Question

By the way, those who are reading Hillary’s What Happened, how does she explain keeping around that perv Huma? Why was the campaign sacrificed to Huma’s diseased sexual preferences? This was the most mystifying part of the whole sorry mess. 

Advertisements

30 thoughts on “Question”

    1. Unfortunately, she isn’t a slut. She is a perv, which is a very different thing. It would be much better for everybody if she whored around instead of staying so loyal to her pedophile.

      Like

      1. Why is she a perv? She tried to keep her family together, and there is no evidence about her sex life except having once conceived a child in the bounds of Holy Matrimony.

        Like

        1. The only reason a woman stays with a perv is because she gets her kicks through his facilitation. It’s a sexual triangle between him, her and the victims. Think Homolka but without the violence and with a lot more money.

          It’s the patriarchal mentality that prevents people from realizing that in such situations women are as erotically engaged as men in victimizing kids.

          Like

              1. I’m referring to your past assertion that drugs that are hallucinatory are physically addicting like opiods.

                Like

              2. You posted about doctors using hallucinogenic drugs to treat depression, and asserted that they wanted a new drug to get their patients addicted to.

                If you can’t remember what you post about, that’s not my problem.

                Like

              3. Can’t you see the differences between these two statements? Really? “A new drug to get addicted” and “as addictive as” are equivalent statements to you?

                Like

          1. It’s the patriarchal mentality that prevents people from realizing that in such situations women are as erotically engaged as men in victimizing kids.
            :/

            I’m not ready to take “secondary gains” to its logical extreme. You’re assuming that she knew all along he was that kind of pervert and turned a blind eye. I just don’t see that she’s like Jerry Sandusky’s wife, for example.

            Like

          1. Most Christians consider matrimony a sacred institution, even if it’s not a sacrament as in the RRC.

            Holy Matrimony: Two Become One

            Jesus said of marriage that “a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife” and “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mark 10:7, 9). The man must leave his family and cleave to his wife. The two shall hold fast to one another and they are not to let any man separate. Why? It’s because it was “God” who “jointed together” the two and now they are legally married before eye witnesses and before God. Jesus warned that “everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery” (Matt 5:32). By seeing that it is God Who joins together the two, we get the “holy” part of the matrimony. We’re not responsible for the holy; God is.

            Your understanding of Christian theology isn’t all that complete, apparently.

            Like

  1. Who around Huma had a normal sex/romantic life that she could use as a model to diagnose her own and/or who could tell her what sick situation she was in?

    As they say, you don’t expect a goldfish to discover water.

    I wouldn’t say that all politicians are morally depraved and corrupt all those around them…. but I wouldn’t bet against any particular politician being morally depraved.

    Like

    1. It’s not like she has any important skill. She’s just a bumbling, useless secretary. Why not get somebody wholesome for that role?

      My only explanation is Hillary’s age that makes her inflexible and little capable of getting used to new people.

      Like

      1. “Why not get somebody wholesome for that role?”

        What on earth makes you think that Hillary could recognize wholesomeoness if it stood in front of her singing ‘my favorite things’? And what makes you think she would want wholesomeoness around her if she could recognize it?

        I think rewarding wholesomeness (by giving it a job) would cause profound cognitive dissonance for her.

        Like

      2. While a student at George Washington University, Abedin began working as an intern in the White House in 1996, assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Clinton. From 1996 to 2008, she was an assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.[17] For several years, she served as the back-up to Clinton’s personal aide. She officially took over as Clinton’s aide and personal advisor during Clinton’s successful 2000 U.S. Senate campaign in New York[4] and later worked as traveling chief of staff and “body woman” during Clinton’s unsuccessful campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.[2][3] Writing in Vogue during the 2007 campaign, Rebecca Johnson called her “Hillary’s secret weapon” and noted that what seemed to motivate Abedin were not the details of policy or political horse-racing, but rather “the way that politicians are uniquely invested with the power to help individuals—as with, say, the woman whose legs were badly broken by a piece of plane fuselage on September 11”, whom Abedin and Clinton visited in the hospital. Abedin told Johnson, “To me, that’s one of the blessings of this job. In some tiny, tiny way I am part of history, but I am also able to help people.”[18] According to a number of Clinton associates, Abedin is also a trusted advisor to Clinton, particularly on the Middle East, and has become known for that expertise.[4] “She is a person of enormous intellect with in-depth knowledge on a number of issues—especially issues pertaining to the Middle East”, said Senator John McCain.[4]

        That’s from the Wiki.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin

        Demonizing others isn’t in your skill set.

        Like

          1. Was there were a time? That idiot picked Palin as his running mate, for gods sake.

            “Rebecca Johnson called her “Hillary’s secret weapon” and noted that what seemed to motivate Abedin were not the details of policy or political horse-racing,”

            That is a polite way of saying that she didn’t know anything about policy or politics.

            Like

  2. The thing is, it’s not like she was some super-intelligent political strategist who could contribute to the campaign. She was a personal assistant who got Hillary her coffee and managed her calendar.

    I understand that Clinton thought of her as a daughter. With her connections, it would’ve been so easy to get Abedin a high paying job where she could do her own thing, removed from the campaign.

    Like

    1. That’s exactly what I’m saying. This is a dime a dozen character. Why keep her with this scandalous history?

      I thought maybe there was an explanation in the book.

      Like

  3. There’s one more thing I’m curious about. Neera Tanden, one of her closest aides and president of a prominent think tank, who has carried water for her since time immemorial, does not have a single mention in the book. She’s the platonic ideal of a Clinton Loyalist. What happened there?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.