I’m in academia, so I know how easy it is to destroy people based on absolutely nothing whatsoever, and this kind of thing sounds very familiar.
“This investigation included interviews with witnesses as well as with Mr. Smiley. The inquiry uncovered multiple, credible allegations of conduct that is inconsistent with the values and standards of PBS, and the totality of this information led to today’s decision.”
Yep, this persecution of Mr. Smiley is based on nothing at all.
Read on. Look at what he is being accused of.
You haven’t processed “multiple, credible allegations” yet.
I have no time or energy for meaningless bickering right now. If you don’t want to read the article, then don’t.
blockquote>According to sources, MSK took reports from 10 witnesses, a mix of men and women of different races and employment levels in Smiley’s organization, most of them former staffers.</ blockquote>
10 witnesses, men and women. Any reason to believe they’ve all simultaneously turned against their former boss?
Call me cynical but I doubt the poor fish you mentioned had 10 witnesses against him, nor was there a law firm involved in investigating him.
Please read the actual list of the accusations.
Clarissa, I would be curious to hear your thoughts on the allegations against Garrison Keillor. His former employer has released no details, Keillor has given his own version of events, and no second accuser has come forward. The last part is what bothers me; it seems like these guys never do it just once. If I hear multiple, independent accusers with no obvious ulterior motive and no track record of dishonesty I am inclined to treat the allegations as plausible. If I hear of one accusation that is emphatically denied and never seconded, I wonder. Doesn’t mean it’s false, but does mean we should wait for more before assuming the worst.
Mention it because Smiley and Keillor are both in public broadcasting.
I don’t know these people, I have never heard these names before. But I’ve witnessed the hot pink incident and I witnessed others. It’s not these Keillors or Lizzas I worry about. They are rich, they’ll be fine. It’s some poor bugger who adjuncts at a community college and who’s destroyed because a student happens not to like him. I know a guy like that. He was eviscerated and thrown out of the profession on the strength of a ridiculous, unsubstantiated accusation. It didn’t have any effect that he was gay and living with his boyfriend, nothing helped.
I think in some quarters this is being used instrumentally to finally kick out aging baby boomers to make room for younger people.
It’s the most transparent in Keillor’s case but some other cases look sort of similar…
Tavis Smiley signed on to publish R. Kelly’s “auto”biography in 2009, a year after declining to allow Michelle Obama to appear at his State of the Black Union event on behalf of her husband. And so it goes, the whole bit about abusive, sexist men defining media narratives. https://t.co/z5gUv1P7v0— Jamilah (@JamilahLemieux) December 13, 2017
So he’s accused of having sex with some of his colleagues…and they were his subordinates….. I’m not saying that this isn’t a difficult thing if you’re a woman, but assuming that Smiley did not suggest to the women that their employment status was dependent on their having sex with him, don’t the women need to tell him they’re not interested instead of sleeping with him and then accusing him of sexual harassment or assault?
According to the criteria of what constitutes harassment these days, I’ve got to ask if there’s anybody who is completely sure they are not guilty under this definition. And isn’t that the whole point.
“what constitutes harassment these days”
Just look at Salma Hayek’s hysterically trying to generate publicity by _not_having been molested by Harvey Weinstein… (AFAICT have too much self-respect to follow the whole story).
When you look at what is alleged, there is nothing non consensual mentioned. One of the complaints is that he brought along a sexual companion on a business trip. That is not illegal!
Maybe these weirdos would have need okay with it, if they where married.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,233 other followers