Remember back when it wasn’t OK to objectify women and reduce us to body parts? Seemed silly and unimportant back then but now that it’s gone, I miss it.

It’s almost always women who get humiliated this way. And always to please a bunch of angry, entitled men.

14 responses to “Bodies with Vaginas”

  1. methylethyl Avatar

    Can we start referring to people who write this crap as “bodies with brain deficits”?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      This is the medical establishment we are supposed to trust. Terrified of a tiny bunch of mentally ill men into a total loss of professionalism. How will they be able to stand up to the pharma industry? Not great, obviously.

      Like

      1. methylethyl Avatar

        The medical establishment is on the verge of obsolescence. What, if anything, will replace it, is an open question.

        At least they don’t do us the disservice of putting up a good front of trustworthiness, so that we’ll be fooled for a while longer about where there priorities lie. We know. They proudly paste it everywhere. They think of us as bodies: interchangeable meat-cogs in a vast money-making machine.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      Right??? It’s always like this. Always! Men are men and women are front holes.

      Like

      1. Alex the Physicist Avatar
        Alex the Physicist

        ahem bodies with front holes.

        Like

        1. Clarissa Avatar

          That definitely makes it better. 🙂

          Like

    2. methylethyl Avatar

      What? Don’t they mean “people with prostates”??

      Like

      1. methylethyl Avatar

        Oh, sorry: “bodies with prostates”. It really does make it sound like forensic investigators opened up a mass grave and found a bunch of corpses… and a bunch of disembodied spare parts.

        Like

  2. Physpostdoc Avatar
    Physpostdoc

    Oh my god… so humiliating! (>.<)

    In which universe is this politically/morally/socially correct way of addressing a human being.

    Like

  3. Just George Avatar
    Just George

    I remember poring through articles published in the Lancet to extract every bit of knowledge I could.

    Now I don’t think of it as a medical journal anymore. It has turned into a very strange, very unappealing tabloid.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Maria Avatar
      Maria

      Are you in a medical profession George? If so, and maybe others who are on this blog who are, does the current propaganda affect the way you interact with patients? I go to a doctor once in a blue moon so I can’t tell.

      Like

      1. Just George Avatar
        Just George

        “Are you in a medical profession George? If so, and maybe others who are on this blog who are, does the current propaganda affect the way you interact with patients?”

        I have a professional qualification in one of the well known medical disciplines but choose not to practice because of changes that were made that transformed the profession into an arm of industry. My attitude is that if I can’t heal people on my terms, I’m not doing it.

        Regarding the propaganda, everyone in this country has been enormously affected. Politicians, lobbyists, and bureaucrats are dictating what can and cannot be prescribed and what can and cannot be counselled. Dissenters are deregistered and hauled before professional tribunals.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Clarissa Avatar

      Lancet used to be a highly respected scholarly publication. And now. . . yes, tabloid is the best way to put it.

      Like

Leave a comment