A non-man. We are right where we started. A new Simone de Beauvoir is urgently needed.
9 responses to “Non-men”
-
It has either been removed or was never a part of that webpage.
https://diversity.jhu.edu/gender-identity-resources/
Hard to say which these days.
LikeLike
-
Remember the good old days, when you were a “body with a uterus”? At least you were defined by an affirmative statement of something you actually have. Now you’re defined only by negation.
LikeLike
-
Welp. Dunno what y’are. But sure glad yer not one of those over thar.
LikeLike
-
-
Simone de Beauvoir is one of the worst anti human culprits who precipitated this negation of femininity, of women.
Because let’s be perfectly clear here: that’s always what the “feminist” project has been about: eugenic transhumanist suppression of human fertility and reproduction by way of the annihilation of sex and the extermination of children in abortion.
Transsexualism is merely the penultimate stage in realization of the ultimate goal, which is the technological transcendence of all human biological limitations in androgyny.
Defining lesbians as “non men” gives their misogynistic game utterly away. “Feminists” have laid the ground for their own extinction, in the eradication of women in the androgyne. If all being a woman is, is to be a malconditioned man, who will opt to be a woman, except men with bizzarre bottom fetishes aping the object if their desire’s desire?
It’s all quite richly ironic and amusing, really. We don’t need another Beauvoir to save women and femininity.. That’s like saying we need another Himmler to restore Zionism. What we truly need to affirm femininity and liberate women is renewed devotion to the Blessed Theotokos.
LikeLike
A conservative literary critic and college professor
Clarissa's Blog 
Leave a comment