Adopting the Language of Safetyism

This is exactly what I’m talking about. Embracing the inane language of safetyism instead of talking about how merit is squeezed out of these prestigious schools by DEI is a loser strategy. For every wounded sufferer of unsafe conditions there will be 10 who are wounded and unsafe because of his very existence. You can’t win at the game of “I feel unsafe.” It’s a stupid game that needs to be abandoned.

One thought on “Adopting the Language of Safetyism

  1. “For every wounded sufferer of unsafe conditions there will be 10 who are wounded and unsafe because of his very existence …”

    Consider this from a different angle: the predatory sufferer who may weaponise suffering in order to trigger the responses of neurotics.

    Yes, you can do something about the predators.

    They’re less likely to be predatory when they are surrounded by healthy people who inoculate neurotics against the predatory suffering hordes.

    Healing neurotics and giving them guns so they’re not such easy prey, that’s where it’s at.

    “… but we don’t like guns …”

    And some people have a fetish of being prey and turning others into prey.

    Pity, obvious solutions are obvious …

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment