So many words to explain the existence of low-libido people:
These “incels” are simply low-libido men who don’t know how to process their health issue. If a healthy male under the age of retirement needs some particularly “hot” women to get going, he’s low-libido. Similarly, if a woman in an eligible-male-rich environment like Montreal or NYC just can’t find anybody attractive, she’s low-libido. This doesn’t mean they are bad but simply wired in a certain way that is not the norm.
People would reject the idea of social engineering to remove “inequities” created by simple physiology but when the inequity in their lives is a result of their own physiology, it’s all “let’s immediately engineer away this unpleasant reality by reshuffling society.”
If these perpetually unmatched people look around, they’ll see that everybody is paired up and very happy without dwelling much on which number on the scale of hotness their honey is. Everybody on here who is happily married: did you ever dwell on how your lovey ranks on some scale? I’m betting you never did because you are simply physically healthy. Your desire is switched on without theorizing and pouting because that’s the norm. We’d all be extinct without it.
There’s absolutely no shame in being low-libido or pre-diabetic or near-sighted, etc. What is shameful is to come up with grand theories to hide from your physiology.