Health Insanity

~ Clarissa

The New York Post editorial board on their meeting with RFK Jr:

“When it came to that topic his views were a head-scratching spaghetti of what we can only call warped conspiracy theories, and not just on vaccines…In fact, we came out thinking he’s nuts on a lot of fronts.”

I don’t know much about this dude RFK and what I know I don’t like. But the sane people in charge of health brought us the opioid epidemic, the obesity epidemic, the autism epidemic, COVID lies and lockdowns, a mental health collapse, and the normalization of puberty blockers and mastectomies for children.

Health has been more full of nuts than a squirrel hideout. One finds it hard to be particularly outraged about RFK after all this.

Unknown's avatar

Published by Clarissa

26 thoughts on “Health Insanity”

  2. If you what you know about Mr. Kennedy is what the nice TV box told you, I advise you to reconsider.

    Dr. Robert Malone vouches for him, among others.

    Outside of health and medicine, I cannot say.

    But it there is any hope of reforming America’s incestuous military, corporate medicine and regulatory state viper’s nest it’s him.

    I’d like to have a functioning tetanus vaccine with known quality controls unhooked from the toxic and pointless dipthereria product. I’d like access to DMSO, safe insomnia drugs (they exist), full safety protocols for SSRI, Gardisil pulled, statins given proper review, the AMA muzzled, and the cozy industry-regulatory revolving door obliterated.

    The U.S. medical system is being bled dry by parasites using DIE as cover.

    Try using a primary source or two for this one.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. I don’t watch TV. All I know about him comes from himself. None of it is heartening.

      This is exactly like when the libs jump down one’s throat with accusations that *you watch Fox News.” No matter how often you tell them than you don’t, they keep repeating, “Fox News, Fox News, Fox News.” It’s inconceivable to them that anybody can actually disagree with their religion without being brainwashed.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. The libs are right. Watching TV rots your brain. They are wrong that it is merely Fox news.

        Aside from that, Miss Clarissa, you do not mention which position paper, essay, or book, on medical or product additive reform of his that concern you. Nor what specifically, especially from the last few years, is a problem.

        You gave a mushy, vague feel-bads reason. So TV box sourcing is likely.

        Here is an example from my I do not know file: “I have read RFKJ in the past support the right to kill up through 9 months”. And he chose a self-recent, even though RvW is kaput (huzzah) constitutionally-speaking, so it is now a states’ rights problem will he attempt fed overreach on it anyway?

        Currently, I only have reasonable hypotheses on this one. For example, RFK would require actual evidence, rather than fraudulent claims, of fetal safety before allowing a chemical company to sell a drug to pregnant women or our currently useless FDA to approve it for that use. So he’s not a loon, but possibly suffering from her “her body, her choice” slogan. Which is not a disqualifier.

        But depending on the answer, it could change my support. And reforming the revolving door between the FDA and the drug- and chemical companies, is so huge, four years is not enough time to be doing anything else.

        However, it is safe to assume that the Abortion is My Sacrament women currently in place will beaver away to undermine him if they feel threatened. As a full-term abortion supporter himself, he may not have the wit to purge them.

        Like

        Reply

    1. Because it is a very ugly man in a dress.

      Chosen by the Biden because he forced NJ nursing homes to take infected Wuhan-S2Cov19-infected patients “to prevent stigma”. The week before he executed the order, he removed his mother to a hotel with a private CNA.

      In one fell swoop as a public health official, he cleared the board of NJ elder-care liabilities for some time to come. And he was at the tip-top of the left’s league table of victims. Clearly the man of the hour, for incoming Biden administration.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

        1. I’m not a fangirl, the dude’s kind of weird, but I have heard him advocate for actual safety testing for current vaccines (which have never been studied for longterm effects or compared to an actual control group), for getting toxic chemicals out of the food supply (like the cancer-causing dyes and stuff), and for trying to end the corruption problem at the FDA with its revolving-door government/industry/government employment problem.

          I’d very much like to give the guy a fair shot at doing those things. If he fails, I don’t think we’re any worse off.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply

          1. The main thing I worry about with RFK is not his ideas about health and medicine, but whether or not he’s a good enough administrator or a strategic enough thinker to execute any real, lasting change in the departments he may be in charge of.

            Like

            Reply

    2. Very ugly man indeed. Also, his drag is quite unfortunate. How come no helpful drag queen has come forward to help him? He really does look like a man in drag.

      The name under which he was born on October 28, 1957 is Richard Leland Levine but as a trans-identified male he goes by Rachel nowadays. He is Jewish, was married and has grown-up children.

      Not only does he think he is a woman, he also thinks he is a navy officer because – under I know not which benighted regulations – on October 19, 2021, he was commissioned as a four-star admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. As a result, he now claims, and mainstream media support his delusion, to be the first female four-star admiral in the Commissioned Corps.

      Liked by 4 people

      Reply

      1. It is a great irony of my life that I have to drive an hour each way to an ethnic grocery store to buy Ukrainian food to give my American kid a healthy breakfast.

        I haven’t been able to comprehensive the point of having the so-called cereal for breakfast unless it’s to make sure everybody becomes diabetic as early as possible in life.

        Liked by 2 people

        Reply

        1. The problem, though, is that nobody is forcing people to eat Froot Loops. They are making that choice freely, out of convenience. You can’t save people from themselves.

          Like

          Reply

          1. Yeah.

            I don’t actually want regulations to ban Froot Loops. I don’t eat them, and I don’t feed them to my kids.

            But I do wonder if perhaps they should require that you be over 18 and show photo ID to purchase, like everything else you can’t trust kids with– alcohol, cigarettes, spraypaint, glue…

            Liked by 1 person

            Reply

          2. Clarissa

            “You can’t save people from themselves.”

            Yes you can and should. Over the years, Canada developed regulations not allowing one to enter combat, or work in a slaughter house until you were 18. And while under 18, I required the written permission from a parent to work in the oil rigs.

            Those and other regulations were developed for solid mental and physical health reasons. And from what I have seen, no-fault divorce where children are involved should also be re-examined. But, largely being an oatmeal savage, if you personally really want to eat the forty eleven chemicals in more colourful modern cereals, fill your boots ;-D

            Like

            Reply

Leave a comment