Moron or Old?

Published by

Clarissa

December 4, 2024

I’m astonished at the profound ignorance on display at the SCOTUS today. Sotomajor and Jackson- you think giving T to a boy is the same as giving it to a girl? You believe a girl can go through “typical male puberty”? I am dumbfounded.

https://x.com/Miriam_Grossman/status/1864389446453346489?t=puXh0dWd4mTSaFWDdRAQuA&s=19

Do you think Jackson and Sotomayor are posturing for political reasons or is this because they are old and sincerely don’t get it?

Here’s more:

“You’re depriving young adults the choice of which sex to adopt,” says Sotomayor to counsel.

Is she a moron? Old? An old moron? Or simply cynical in the extreme?

I could live with cynicism but what if she really thinks that “the choice of which sex to adopt” is a normal thing to say?

Rate this:

8 responses to “Moron or Old?”

Stringer Bell

December 4, 2024

Morons. Sotomayor is the dumbest SCOTUS judge in history. Like eye-wateringly dumb. And since Jackson was explicitly a diversity hire, she cannot be far behind.

Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) · November 1, 2022

In a discussion over affirmative action, Sotomayor ironically shows she doesn't know the basic difference between "de facto" and "de jure."

It's not a slip of the tongue, they go back and forth, Alito tries to correct her and she proceeds to make the same mistake. pic.twitter.com/6RjJR1FfSz

View on X

LikeLiked by 1 person

Reply
Stringer Bell

December 4, 2024

ib (@Indian_Bronson) · June 30, 2023

It’s pretty clear from Ketanji’s dissent in the Harvard affirmative action case and Sotomayor’s dissent in the Colorado speech case that they’re both really dumb—not just ideological and dishonest, but actually not smart enough to exercise judgment on behalf of others.

Not good.

View on X

ib (@Indian_Bronson) · June 29, 2023

That defense of affirmative action makes total sense coming from the self-described "Wise Latina" Sotomayor, whom even Lawrence Tribe @tribelaw described as being actually pretty stupid, though appealing for diversity reasons, in a letter to Barack Obama: https://t.co/qNxC4FX8kB pic.twitter.com/UBKBaPWHOv

View on X

LikeLike

Reply
donbenham

December 4, 2024

I’m with you! Supreme Court justice or not, what she said is truly remarkable. What attempts to pass as “good judgement” is silly. Another case of the Emperor’s New Clothes.

LikeLiked by 1 person

Reply
mosckerr

December 5, 2024

If athletes prohibited from taking body enhancing steroids why should children receive testosterone? The logic seems kooky to me.

LikeLike

Reply
1. methylethyl
  
  December 5, 2024
  
  –particularly when part of the reasoning for prohibiting steroids at the level of high school sports, was that the players were minors, and it had very negative effects on their long-term health.
  
  LikeLiked by 2 people
  
  Reply
  1. mosckerr
    
    December 5, 2024
    
    Reactionary emotion based logic does not go very far once a person compares it to similar cases.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Reply
oldcowboy3

December 5, 2024

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

Sotomayor is obviously both a racist and a sexist, and thus demonstrably unfit to sit in judgement on anybody.

And as for Ketanji, tragically, I suspect that even provided with high school biology textbooks, a map, a flashlight, and both hands, she would apparently still be unable to locate her own butt ;-D

LikeLiked by 1 person

Reply
Stringer Bell

December 5, 2024

Tired of being ruled by absolute retards.

Greg Price (@greg_price11) · December 4, 2024

Rice: "How many minors have to have their bodies irreparably harmed for unproven benefits?"

Sotomayor: "Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking Aspirin." pic.twitter.com/I4k8ujr5Hl

View on X

LikeLiked by 3 people

Reply