The Chancellor called the police to remove the union members who came to protest at his budget talk with small, hand painted signs. The signs were not threatening or insulting but they did make a gentle pun on his last name. I’ll link but I don’t promise the article wouldn’t be censored again.
This shows that he’s a very inexperienced administrator who is not ready for this role. A person who is fit to lead would have addressed the content of the signs with good humor and sweetness. He’d say, “guys, great pun. My own favorite pun on my last name is this…” That would have been more productive for him than turning protesters into martyrs.
Today, we had another, much larger protest, and many more people came with this exact sign. Because they now know that it gets to him.
Forget about my university and this particular Chancellor. The point is that if you want to have an impact, you can’t leak. You can’t leak emotionally. Practice, meditate, imagine that you are surrounding yourselves with high walls that conceal you from view.
If you are a teacher, an administration, or a supervisor of any kind, you cannot respond to people under your command emotionally. You lose all authority by doing that. Even to direct insults you can only respond with motherly or fatherly kindness. And it has to be completely genuine. People experience high levels of anxiety around a teacher or boss who comes off as uncertain and emotionally incontinent. They act out more because of this anxiety.
Also, one more important trick. If somebody sends you long, ranting complaints, never respond to them with more than three sentences.
Sentence 1 should be: Dear ABC, thank you for communicating your concerns / wishes / ideas.
Sentence 2: Unfortunately, I will not be able to implement these suggestions. (Or whatever is appropriate to the situation).
Sentence 3: I propose that you…. And briefly outline what you propose. Briefly being the operative word.
The most loserish thing you can do is to start writing a point-by-point rebuttal of the complaint, bickering over details. Or give explanations of why you do things you consider necessary. Whoever explains, loses. Forget the word “because.” “Because” will be your downfall as a figure of authority.
I have talked down such a number of problem students, colleagues, and administrators over the years that I am absolutely certain that this is the only way. And you know what? The administrator with whom I had the most ferocious public confrontations (during COVID it was) later told me privately that he really respected how I never gave any reasons and was always very secure in my conviction of what I was doing. Since then, we became great allies on a different cause while still despising each other’s position on COVID. And I now see him imitate my “no, I will not be doing this, thank you” in our current struggle which is kind of really cute.
“a gentle pun on his last name”
Can’t access the article but all I can say is, only a very minor figure would be upset by something like that.
LikeLike
The workers very correctly pointed out that the budget is a minor issue, and he got upset. It’s so not manly to get angry and vindictive over such a thing. I would understand this touchiness in a teenage girl but a grown man in a position of authority, it’s embarrassing
LikeLike
What about the other side? What is the best way for a colleague/student to make their case to you that makes it most likely that they get what they want?
LikeLiked by 1 person
All I ask is that people are brief. I know my mind very well and only need the bare bones of a request to decide what I want to do.
People often think that giving absolutely every detail of their situation and its anticedents is necessary but it’s the exact opposite. People who give a lot of details sound like they are self-justifying.
Sadly, it often takes me several email exchanges and an in-person conversation to wrangle out of a student what he actually wants. And it turns out to be something that I’m very glad to do. Time gets wasted for no reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Basic rule: do not explain, do not complain.
LikeLike
Outrageous overreaction:
“I was surprised by the amount of police presence there in the first place. Not to say there shouldn’t be some security around campus, but there were several people there in full gear,” Kallisto said. “It’s not like there’s a history of violence or aggression at these events. It really gave a weird energy.”
Galling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. This is a demonization of organized labor. Completely uncalled for and, frankly, insulting.
LikeLike