Sign up for a free recipe e-book →

Clarissa's Blog

We Have It Good

Published by

Clarissa

on

I haven’t posted much today because I’ve spent all day reading a book about Mexico’s dysfunction. I’ll write in detail after I’m done reading (it’s 500+ pages) but my main takeaway so far is that we have no idea how fortunate we are in America and how precious our civilization is. We need to do everything not to allow the chaos that exists in Mexico (and almost everywhere else) spill over here.

I feel like coming up to strangers and saying, “you have no idea how good you have it, man. Don’t let it slip away. Please, please, be very careful.”

13 responses to “We Have It Good”

  1. Stringer Bell Avatar
    Stringer Bell

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply
  2. mosckerr Avatar
    mosckerr

    A completely different dysfunction ….

    Why Jews view the Xtian church as the worst Av Tuma Nazi like avoda zarah?

    The vision of Torah as an oath-based, constitutional brit alliance cut between the chosen Cohen people who alone accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, whose revelation centers upon judicial justice and prophetic mussar—not theological creeds or divine incarnations or false messiah Son of God theological creeds. Silly Xtian, even by the exceptionally low standards of your sophomoric bible translations Proverbs 1:33 says: “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” (KJV); this lone verse contained within the larger sugya of 1:20-2:22.

    Shlomo rebukes his son for refusal to pursue Oral Torah wisdom. His pursuit of foreign women cultural adultery – a direct Torah curse.

    Silly Xtian, even by the exceptionally low standards of your sophomoric bible translations Proverbs 1:33 says: “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” (KJV). You silly reactionary Goyim have no wisdom. Goyim remind me how water behaves on a hot skillet! Ya ball up, bounce around, and make noise.

    Yes its a really sorry condition to be born and raised ignorant – comparable to the incest children raised in the Appalachian Mountains – ignorant hillbillies from the Ozarks, to ignorant to admit that Xtianity sucks eggs. T’NaCH common law learns through precedents. Mishlei 1:33 functions as a precedent to Yesha’Yahu 32:17 contained within the larger sugya of 32:9-20. Pathetic Goyim don’t know that ya can’t uproot a verse out of its surrounding contexts without perverting it to Nazi like propaganda! T’NaCH a common law legal system. But you Appalachians don’t know this because your church denies the existence of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Truly sucks being as ignorant as sticks.

    Righteousness has nothing to do with theological Creed belief systems like the new testament promotes JeZeus as the messiah Son of God – bull shit. Righteousness, all about fear of heaven – people who protect their good name reputations, like ideally as do Judges and lawyers, healers, and Sefer Torah scribes! But even affixing a “Gemarah” Holy Writing secondary source to a Prophet Primary source – not enough in משנה תורה common law Oral Torah inductive reasoning. A scholar, with fear of heaven, learns that Prophet source to some other Prophetic precedent then back to the Book of D’varim and ideally even back to the Book of בראשית which introduces Av tohor time oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna.

    Torah law not some new testament bull shit with an axe to grind which prostitutes T’NaCH verses to promote its new testament avoda zarah abominations which believe in av tumah other false messiahs and other nonsensical Gods on a stick.

    To understand the sugya 32:9-20 requires that a person learn this strong prophetic mussar rebuke in the context of 32:1-8. Through the wisdom of Oral Torah Pardes inductive logic reasoning, a close precedent which permits a person to read this same idea viewed from a fresh and completely different perspective: 5:1-6 of the same prophet. Torah holds tremendous depths, like a diamond has tens of thousands of facet faces! The new testament Paul and JeZeus pony Goebbels propaganda show declares that a T’NaCH verse only has one narrow meaning, which Xtian church authorities dictate, comparable to only the Government can print money!

    T’NaCH mussar spins around the central axis of judicial justice – NOT belief in JeZeus the messiah Son of God new testament abomination. The opening verse of Prashat שופטים testifies to this emphasis priority of Torah faith. The sugya of D’varim 24:14,15 commands this strong prophetic mussar. When the 3 Melachim visited Avraham after he did the brit melah – they visited a “righteous” man. HaShem blessed Avraham in everything – because he lived a righteous life. Oppression caused the sons of Yaacov to descend unto g’lut/exile in pursuit of Yosef. The wicked do not call upon HaShem. The Avot called upon El Shaddai as their God. On Chag Sukkot the soul name dedicated on that regel Yom Tov – the Nefesh Yechida/El Shaddai. Every 5th day of the week kabbalah instructs that a man call from the depths of his heart the remembrance of the El Shaddai soul dedicated on the regel of Sukkot. The Divine Oral Torah tohor spirits live within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who remember the oaths by which the Avot swore an oath alliance with HaShem.

    HaShem made Moshe a “lord like messiah” to Par’o by which Moshe judged the Gods worshipped by Par’o and the Egyptians as JeZeus like other false Gods. Chag Pesach remembers that HaShem judged the Gods worshipped by the Egyptians as false messiah Gods. The mitzva to remember to expunge the assimilation and intermarriage ערב רב whose lack of fear of heaven – the root cause of all antisemitism throughout the generations. This Torah curse, comes through Jews pursuing their life interests without remembering the oaths the Avot swore — their tohor time oriented commandments which create the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations as a living תמיד מעשה בראשית.

    The ultimate בנין אב precedent, the Parshah of תרומה! Only a fool could read this Parshah through the silly eyes of טיפש פשט. This Parshah employs the vessels of the Mishkan merely as a משל. Oral Torah פרדס logic demands that the reader make the דיוק logical inference and grasp the נמשל prophetic mussar which instructs the faith of the pursuit of righteous judicial justice.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Stringer Bell Avatar
      Stringer Bell

      Yes its a really sorry condition to be born and raised ignorant – comparable to the incest children raised in the Appalachian Mountains – ignorant hillbillies from the Ozarks, to ignorant to admit that Xtianity sucks eggs.

      You are a psychopath. And a perfect representative of your country.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply
      1. mosckerr Avatar
        mosckerr

        Noise. You bear the guilt blood of the Shoah.

        Like

        Reply
        1. Stringer Bell Avatar
          Stringer Bell

          You bear the guilt blood of the Shoah.

          My response every time the Del Taco drive-thru messes up my order!

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply
          1. mosckerr Avatar
            mosckerr

            Del Taco does not serve pizza with pepperoni

            Like

            Reply
          2. mosckerr Avatar
            mosckerr

            Xtianity no different —

            The YOUTUBE clip: Brandon Gill SHUTS UP unhinged Jasmine Crockett after her woke tirade crosses the line, depicts tuma cognitive warfare.
            In this context, the Brandon Gill–Jasmine Crockett exchange isn’t just political drama—it’s an orchestrated moment of cognitive warfare. It bypasses policy debate and instead targets identity, emotion, and tribal loyalty. Whether orchestrated or simply exploited after the fact, it contributes to a larger system of psychological manipulation in the infosphere.

            The exchange, especially when edited for conflict, activates the amygdala—The amygdala is a small, almond-shaped cluster of nuclei located deep within the temporal lobes of the brain. It is part of the limbic system and plays a crucial role in processing emotions, particularly those related to fear, pleasure, and aggression. The amygdala is involved in the formation of emotional memories and helps to regulate responses to emotional stimuli. It also interacts with other brain regions to influence behavior and decision-making based on emotional experiences—engaging fear, anger, and pleasure centers more than rational analysis. This is neurological capture: inflaming emotional circuits to override deliberative cognition, keeping the brain in “us vs. them” mode.

            The incident is cast as a metaphor for larger ideological battles: conservatism vs. progressivism, order vs. disruption, “truth” vs. “wokeness.” It conditions viewers to see political discourse as a zero-sum spectacle, aligning them with a cultural narrative beyond just policy.

            The audience for this clip is clearly targeted: politically engaged individuals on the right who are fatigued by “woke” rhetoric. The language, editing, and dissemination aim to reinforce existing biases and trigger dopamine-rewarding outrage or schadenfreude—a German term that refers to the feeling of pleasure or satisfaction that one experiences from witnessing the misfortunes of others. It combines the words “Schaden,” meaning harm or damage, and “Freude,” meaning joy. This emotion can arise in various contexts, such as when someone feels happy about a rival’s failure or when they find humor in another person’s embarrassing situation.

            The clip’s virality is no accident. It is tailored for shareability—short, emotionally charged, adversarial. Social platforms algorithmically favor such content, turning it into a weaponized meme that deepens echo chambers and reduces nuanced discourse to winner/loser binaries.

            By elevating one lawmaker as a symbol of order and the other as chaos, this exchange becomes a tool to rally supporters and demoralize opponents. It sends an implicit message: “Our side dominates; theirs is irrational.” This plays on tribal loyalty, a cornerstone of PSYOPS.

            The viral framing—“Brandon Gill SHUTS UP unhinged Jasmine Crockett”—is a classic example of selective narrative construction. The title primes viewers with a judgment (“unhinged”) and a victor (“shuts up”), shaping perception before any facts are absorbed. This is cognitive framing designed to elicit emotional reactions, especially among partisan audiences.

            While various frameworks exist to understand cognitive warfare, one perspective outlines six key facets that collectively target neurological and psychological processes:

            1. The deliberate dissemination of false or misleading information to confuse, mislead, or influence target audiences. This includes tactics like spreading fake news, deepfakes, and conspiracy theories to erode trust in institutions and factual information.

            2. Strategic campaigns designed to influence the emotions, motives, and objective reasoning of individuals or groups. These operations aim to alter perceptions and behaviors to align with specific objectives.

            3. Utilizing platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to amplify divisive narratives, suppress dissenting opinions, and create echo chambers. This facet leverages algorithms and bots to manipulate public discourse and sentiment.

            4. Employing data analytics and machine learning to identify cognitive vulnerabilities and tailor messages that can influence decision-making processes. This includes personalized propaganda and predictive behavior modeling.

            5. Emerging technologies that interact directly with the human nervous system, such as brain-computer interfaces and neurostimulation techniques. These tools have the potential to alter cognitive functions and behaviors, raising ethical and security concerns.

            6. Shaping cultural narratives and ideological frameworks to align with specific agendas. This includes influencing education, media, and public discourse to gradually shift societal values and beliefs.

            Like

            Reply
      2. Clarissa Avatar
        Clarissa

        I’ve been called many things but never an Appalachian incest child. Maybe I should put it in the blog header for people to see the brilliance of us, Appalachian incest children.

        Liked by 2 people

        Reply
        1. cliff arroyo Avatar
          cliff arroyo

          “an Appalachian incest child”

          Maybe some of us identify as Appalachian incest children….

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply
          1. Clarissa Avatar
            Clarissa

            It’s better to be an Appalachian incest child than to believe that India caused the Holocaust.

            Liked by 1 person

            Reply
            1. methylethyl Avatar
              methylethyl

              All those swastikas on their temples tho… it must mean something! 😉

              Liked by 1 person

              Reply
        2. oldcowboy3 Avatar
          oldcowboy3

          “…the brilliance of us, Appalachian incest children.”

          LOL, well, line breeding can increase beneficial genetic traits, but it can also multiply the negative, as unfortunate individuals such as King Chuckie the third, and quite possibly Mosckerr, demonstrate ;-D

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply
  3. Stringer Bell Avatar
    Stringer Bell

    The president of Uganda’s son live-tweeting the torture of an opposition leader.

    Libs will tell us that all human societies are the same, and western nations are purely propositional nations that have nothing to do with their ethnos. Every Ugandan is just a pre-american becoming fully american once he steps on our shores and gets handed a copy of the Constitution™.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment

A conservative literary critic and college professor

Recent posts