We can see the war on rootedness in everything. For example, in academia it’s considered a point of pride to be a first-generation college student but definitely not to be a fifth-generation one.
Why, though?
Because it’s harder to be the former? But why is hardship a point of pride? “But I tried hard” is a childish argument. Only very immature people think that effort, and not the result, should be rewarded. Why don’t we celebrate the amazing achievement of families that manage to send several generations to college? Why is it a great thing to go against the family tradition?
Renaud Camus says that a farmer’s son who goes to university sets himself apart from his entire family. If his education is minimally successful, he’ll feel forever like an outsider in his own family. Similarly, a professor’s child who doesn’t pursue a college degree is set apart from her family. Why do we instinctively like these choices more than the ones made in accordance with the family tradition?
Because we have been trained like Pavlovian dogs to wince at tradition and celebrate rootlessness.







