The Texas A&M Scandal

Facing growing political pressure, Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III announced Monday evening that the dean and department head overseeing a children’s literature course at the center of a viral recording were going to be removed, saying they approved plans to teach material inconsistent with the published course description.

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/09/08/texas-am-video-professor-student-gender-identity-content/

The material that this person was teaching was absolutely inappropriate and wrong but what do the department head and the dean have to do with it? I have absolutely no idea what my faculty members are teaching. Neither does our dean. We aren’t a high school. There are no “approved materials.” I can’t imagine the Dean I currently have approving much of what I say about socialism, US foreign policy, mass migration, etc. But so what? It’s my academic freedom. He wouldn’t dare make a peep about my materials and assigned readings. And that’s good.

The problem here is not with course materials.

From the videos of the incident, it’s clear that the faculty member who taught the course is a crap teacher outside of any ideological considerations. She has no understanding of basic pedagogy and doesn’t know how to engage productively with a student who challenges her politely. We all have students who challenge what we say in class. Knowing how to respond in a way that advances our teaching goals is Pedagogy 101. If you can’t even do that, what can you do?

I love students who contradict me in class. It shows that they are engaged. They care. They want to participate. And I’m not always right. I have apologized on various occasions, saying, “you are absolutely right, my mistake. Thank you for pointing it out.” I love such moments because they are wonderful for establishing trust and rapport with students.

I have had students challenge me aggressively, especially when I was a much younger, early-career academic. Every time, I handled it with dignity, understanding, and kindness. It never occurred to me to throw a student out. In the end, every such student apologized and shared the reasons that drove them to this behavior. I once had a student, strung out on meth, curse me out and threaten me in the classroom. The week after that, she was weeping in my office, telling me how much she appreciated that I didn’t “fuck me up like I fucking deserved for being such a stupid fuck.” I was 24, and this was my first year teaching college. And still, I handled it professionally.

The A&M student who started the hullabaloo is a dream student. She’s polite, articulate, well-spoken. If the Dean and the department head deserve removal, it’s not because of the materials, for which they bear no responsibility, but because they aren’t doing faculty development. Every semester you should be doing something to improve everybody’s pedagogical skills. Including your own. Or you end up with faculty who can’t handle the most basic situations in the classroom.

In one of the videos of the incident, the faculty member (I’m very unconvinced she’s a professor) says “I’m the authority in this classroom.” Dude, only people with zero authority have to say they are the authority. You can’t demand respect. You must generate it. You gain authority by behaving like one.

It’s embarrassing to watch this faculty member flail pathetically like teaching was invented 15 minutes ago and she’s trying to figure it out on the spot. That’s why I don’t think she has tenure. If she does, the university must revise its entire tenure-granting process.

P.S. I googled this “professor”, and I was right. She’s a senior lecturer. Not even an instructor. This is why you want professors, and not a troop of contingent laborers with zero interest in teaching, to work in higher education. Again, none of this is about ideology for me. This is simply an issue of being unqualified for the job.

4 thoughts on “The Texas A&M Scandal

  1. “She has no understanding of basic pedagogy and doesn’t know how to engage productively with a student who challenges her politely”

    Number one rule of basic pedagogy: The teacher cannot learn anything in place of the student. The teacher can only help (or hinder) students learning things for themselves.

    I used to scandalize Polish teachers by my indifference to not knowing everything (in Poland a teacher is expected to know _everything_ about what they’re teaching) while I have no problem at all saying “I have no idea….”. If there’s time I might look it up on the spot (not great methodology but I tell myself it can also help them to see what an informed search looks like….

    “I love students who contradict me in class”

    They are the best! I love it when students question or challenge what I say. Sometimes they’re thinking of something else and we can work that out together and sometimes I get confused and say something dumb (hey, it happens…). I always make a point of thanking students (sincerely) for questions or corrections.

    Like

  2. OT: Every few years Nepal manages to make the news is crazy ways…. first it was a soap opera murder tragedy when a young member of the royal family was convinced by his wife (from a rival clan) to kill has parents…

    Then a massive earthquake destroyed a bunch of Kathmandu(sp?) in a few minutes.

    Now, the population, steadily upset with corruption by filthy rich communists snapped after the government tried to shut down social media and parliament and the presidential palace are up in flames, politicians are fleeing by plane and those that haven’t/can’t are being attacked and/or killed by angry mobs.

    https://x.com/saintjavelin/status/1965395408445710780

    I would say/hope this makes a bunch of European governments very, very nervous but… those are old societies while Nepal is young and full of piss and vinegar.

    Like

  3. Well, I don’t think that this is an “ideal student” by any stretch of the imagination. She may be speaking calmly but she is quite clearly threatening the instructor’s position by informing her that she already met with the university president and is documenting her behavior etc. And this is purely ideological on the part of the student. In my opinion, she is no better than the race-obsessed students who led anti-faculty “cancelling sessions” in the SJW era. I don’t think that students should make any religiously or politically motivated demands over course content. At the university level, faculty should decide what to include in the course content. Anything else is a violation of academic freedom.

    That being said, this instructor is ideologically motivated herself and handled the whole situation terrrrribly. There are a million ways to discuss matters like this and explain how a text fits into the structure of the class. But instead the instructor chose the “confessional model” of pedagogy and just dully repeated “my gender is not illegal”. What? What does that have to with anything. Don’t make it about you. Make it about the text. And the truth is, she didn’t have a solid pedagogical reason for including the text. The syllabus and the texts she included were motivated by solipsism.

    Like

Leave a comment