Democrats are having another completely normal one by claiming that Americans who dare step outside deserve to be murdered by terrorists:
The idea that the terrorist would have decided to behave in law-abiding, peaceful ways if these specific victims weren’t outdoors is nothing short of bizarre. Doesn’t it make more sense to assume that he would have shot somebody else? Of course, sense and The Atlantic parted ways a very long time ago.
The sheer intellectual poverty of these predictable, cookie-cutter arguments is painful to observe. Liberalism has turned into a prison of the mind where no actual thinking, reading, and creativity is allowed to happen.
By the same logic, we should just stop having cops and firemen, because so many of them are killed and injured on the job.
I mean, you can’t be injured in a house fire, if you just never go near fires, right?
-ethyl
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s exactly where this argument leads.
Truly, these people will say anything to avoid condemning the actual murderer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At this point, I’m just wondering if all the drug cartel money connections in DC will ever go public.
Things I didn’t think were related to drugs, keep circling back to drugs. Are drugs the biggest political force of our time?
-ethyl
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are drugs the biggest political force of our time?
They are, and are closely linked with real estate and the world of finance.
LikeLike
Huh.
Puts a whole new light on the people out there claiming our military is sinking “innocent fishing boats” in the Caribbean then. Wish we could order a forensic audit of every one of them.
-ethyl
LikeLike