The “woman” in this news report is 15. The two rapists are 17 but they are referred to as “boys.”
Utterly Shameless
Opinions, art, debate
Opinions, art, debate
The “woman” in this news report is 15. The two rapists are 17 but they are referred to as “boys.”
Clarissa's Blog 
“The two rapists are 17 but they are referred to as “boys.””
And they’re not from “Leamington”…. they’re Afghan boat migrants that the UK apparently wants lots more of….
I don’t know why the UK is determined for British women to be raped by muslims but it’s clearly their job number one….
And I really don’t know why the British public hasn’t marched on parliament yet…
LikeLike
Yes, “British boys” who keep raping “women”, magically tend to turn out to be not British. And probably not boys judging by the pictures. I mean, how does anybody know they are really 17? They don’t look remotely 17. Is it because they said so? Did anybody bother to check before sending them to youth court?
LikeLiked by 1 person
If they weren’t born in the UK, odds are very good they are older than claimed, because that extends the time period their parents/guardians can collect public benefits for them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s what I’m saying. There’s been widespread fraud with adult migrants claiming to be teenagers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“widespread fraud with adult migrants claiming to be teenagers”
Who’d a thunk it? People from chaotic and violent exceptionally low trust societies gaming the rules from a well-ordered (until now) high trust society….
At this point in Europe, you can have a country or the ECHR but not both.
LikeLike