Rape Ambassador

~ Clarissa

Edys Renan Membreño Díaz from Honduras crossed the border into the US illegally 7 times. After his most recent arrival, he grabbed a disabled woman with cerebral palsy and cognitive delays, dragged her into her apartment building’s laundry room, and proceeded to rape and sodomize her with horrific brutality.

He was convicted in 2022 and will be up for parole in July 2028. Not much of a sentence, given the severity of the offense. “In the age of #MeToo”, you know. “Believe women.” Unless they are raped by a convenient migrant, in which case screw them.

One possibility of keeping Edys Renan Membreño Díaz locked up for longer was to convict him for immigration crimes. The prosecutors tried to tack on 2 more years to his sentence because every day he’s locked up is one more day when he’s not raping women.

Not all women, however, care to help other women to avoid being raped by this dweeb. The District Judge Judith Levy decided that instead of being sentenced for violating immigration law, Membreño Díaz has to be praised as, and I quote, being a future “ambassador for living up to our immigration restrictions” who exhibited “family devotion and willingness to perform work that Americans find undesirable.”

The rapist received no additional sentence. We can expect him to be out of jail and ready to resume his ambassadorial duties in 2,5 years.

Unknown's avatar

Published by Clarissa

25 thoughts on “Rape Ambassador”

    1. I saw. That guy is hardcore, rushing the shooter like that.

      Are there any news on the shooting at Brown? How is it possible that with all the cameras they have, there’s no good image of the shooter?

      Like

      Reply

          1. Yeah, that was my thought. If you picked a random college prof from the campus roster… what odds it’d be a Friedberg? Doesn’t necessarily mean anything.

            Like

            Reply

    2. The weird thing is male genital mutilation (circumcision) is also ethno-religious in nature but nobody gives a shit. Equally barbaric.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Agreed it is barbaric, and we refused it for our kids. But do not think it is equal to FGM. I’m open to new information here, but I’ve never heard that a normal male circumcision renders the man unable to enjoy sex, interferes with urination, and… there’s no equivalent to obstructed menstrual flow so ???

        Like

        Reply

        1. “Unable” is a high bar to cross but the procedure does interfere with sexual function. This is just from chatgpt:

          Circumcision results in the permanent removal of the foreskin, a specialized anatomical structure with distinct sensory and functional roles that are not replicated elsewhere on the penis. The foreskin consists of both keratinized skin and a non-keratinized mucosal surface, including the ridged band, which contains a high concentration of fine-touch nerve receptors responsible for light, erogenous sensation. Unlike the glans, which is primarily sensitive to pressure and pain, the foreskin contributes a different and complementary sensory profile, meaning its removal entails an unavoidable loss of sensory diversity. Functionally, the foreskin facilitates a natural gliding mechanism during sexual activity, reduces friction, helps retain lubrication, and protects the glans from chronic exposure and abrasion. Following circumcision, the exposed glans often undergoes increased keratinization, which can further diminish sensitivity over time. Because this tissue cannot be regenerated and outcomes vary unpredictably between individuals, critics argue that removing healthy, innervated, and functional tissue—particularly without the individual’s consent and absent clear medical necessity—constitutes a significant and irreversible loss rather than a neutral anatomical change.

          Like

          Reply

          1. Not equivalent. Still barbaric: I mean why would you lop pieces off a healthy baby for any reason? No. We left our sons intact. I’m opposed to infant ear-piercings for similar reasons: permanent unnecessary body modifications are just not OK to do to children. If they want to do it as adults, with full informed consent: fine. Not children.

            But at the same time, no, it’s not equivalent to the most common forms of FGM, which render sex a painful chore for life. Don’t see Jewish families out there having trouble procreating because the men would rather avoid sex. Would expect that, if male and female circumcision were equal things. The women so treated of course do not have the option of avoiding so it doesn’t matter whether they enjoy it or not. But nobody’s forcing circumcised men to have sex… they do it anyway. Completely voluntarily. For reasons other than procreation, even. This strongly suggests they still get a fair amount of reward out of it.

            -ethyl

            Like

            Reply

        2. “do not think it is equal to FGM”

          Not in the same universe… I get very weary of people dragging it up whenever people try to speak against hacking and slashing at 10 year-old-girls genitals with razors (and no anesthesia) and tying their legs together for over a month.

          Claiming they are anywhere close to equally harmful procedures ends up making it harder to stop FGM.

          Like

          Reply

          1. exactly. 60% of baby boys in the US are still being circumcised. If it was causing equivalent sexual dysfunction in men, we’d definitely know about it by now.

            Like

            Reply

    1. good grief.

      Saw a news blurb not long ago, involving a chinese couple in the US, and a bunch of seriously neglected surrogate-produced children… and could not fathom what that was about. This article makes it make sense. So thanks.

      -ethyl

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. I’ve been saying it for years. Every Russian bandit would ship his many mistresses to Florida to give birth so that they could get US passports. And of course it’s not only Russian bandits. It’s gangsters, crooks, and evil-doers from all over the world. Does anybody really think that this is what the Founding Fathers had in mind? It’s a travesty.

        Like

        Reply

    1. Yes, despite more than half a century of feminist horseshit², all the cryin’, bitchin’, and whinin’, instincts rule ;-D

      Like

      Reply

Leave a comment