I’m sitting in a meeting where we’ve done a variation of the following dialogue for a little over an hour.
“Content reviews are necessary because they are required by the CBA.”
“How necessary are content reviews, though?”
“They are necessary because they are required by the CBA.”
A long explanation of what exactly the CBA requires.
“If nobody has any more questions…”
“I’m sorry, I just need a clarification on content reviews. Are they completely necessary?”
“Yes, they are necessary because they are required by the CBA.”
An even longer explanation of what exactly the CBA requires.
“If nobody has any more questions…”
“I’m sorry, just a little clarification on content reviews…”
We were supposed to be done with the discussion on content reviews 45 minutes ago.
Every person present in the room has sat through at least half a dozen of identical conversations on content reviews.
Clarissa's Blog 
“sat through at least half a dozen of identical conversations on content reviews”
But…. are they really necessary necessary or just if-we-can-do-it-easy necessary?
LikeLike
Wait, are you in this room with us? That would explain your level of insight into our dysfunction. 😁😁
LikeLike
Now we’ve shifted towards reciting Don Lemon’s talking points and I’m preparing to ask a question about the need for content reviews.
LikeLike
“they are required by the CBA”
But what do they have to do with corruption?
I was confused for a moment because CBA is the initials of the Central Anticorruption Bureau in Poland (Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne) which is frequently in the news here….
LikeLike
OK, OK, I didn’t really think you were in the room with us. Unfortunately.
Imagine the fun we could be having.
LikeLike