I truly thought I’ve seen everything, but here is an article from the New York Times criticizing women for going out in public while pregnant and not trying to conceal their pregnancies. The article suggests that pregnant women should wear “the maternity muumuu.”
I vaguely remember reading that back in the 18th century, it was considered unfashionable to appear outside when you were pregnant because many people thought that was indecent. It’s… curious that we’ve gone a full circle and they’re now reverting to bashing women for daring not to make a huge secret of their pregnancies.
Coupled with yesterday’s win in the NYC Democrat primaries of a Haitian woman who recently converted to Islam and is wearing a burqa-type outfit, these developments point in a bad direction.
It will never quit being entertaining that women hiding in burqas and muumuus are the next frontier of women’s liberation.
Clarissa's Blog 
LOL, nobody knows what the herd is going to do next, including themselves. I can remember my Mom sayng somethng was the fashion, but when I asked she couldn’t really seem to explain how it worked ;-D
LikeLike
😀
They are really butthurt that prominent R-associated ladies are going about showing off their fecundity. Everything Mrs. Vance, or Mrs. Miller or the press secretary are all doing must be Banned From Public Life. Because that’s the only trick they know. They even attached these ladies’ photos for the mandatory three minutes’ hate.
ethyl
LikeLike
I understand feeling envious of women who are basking in their femininity and the bloom of maternity, but one would think that people would usually conceal such thoughts from others, not publish them in the New York Times.
What a victory for feminism! Pregnant women should be neither seen nor heard. Truly outstanding.
LikeLike