The article for which I have my September 15 deadline is hard because it’s about masculinity. Masculinity is impossible to write about because it is one of the most belabored topics in the humanities. Anything of even the slightest interest and depth that could have been said on this subject was said back in the 1980s, and people mostly keep repeating whatever was said back then. Even thinking about thinking about (sic) masculinity bores me to tears. Which is exactly why I chose to contribute to a volume on masculinity. I like a challenge, and this topic is like trying to milk a male goat. Something will eventually trickle out, but nobody will want to consume it.

So here is what I came up with: neoliberalism doesn’t give a hoot about your gender identity, sexuality, or how traditional or non-traditional your masculinity is. To the contrary, it offers up complete sexual freedom, liberated from any form of judgment or constraint, as a consolation prize for robbing you of economic stability. You can be gender fluid all you want, as long as you accept never being economically mobile in return. So maybe let’s stop prattling endlessly about masculinities and turn our attention to the issue of class.

I don’t use the words “prattling endlessly” in the article, but this is the gist. And there’s a lot of Chirbes in the article. I’m sure everybody on here is sick of Chirbes so I won’t repeat those parts.

6 responses to “My New Article”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    “You can be gender fluid all you want, as long as you accept never being economically mobile in return. So maybe let’s stop prattling endlessly about masculinities and turn our attention to the issue of class.”

    I think this is a really good reading of modern neoliberalism, and is crucial to the failure of the left in the United States and the West broadly. I think there could have been a large social democratic party in the US if there were 1) a focus on class and not these neoliberal identitarian labels 2) a strict commitment to a nation state and Western values. Instead, postmodernism came out of academic and fundamentally took over much of political thought on the left.

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      Yes, and what’s the reason? Because it’s enjoyable. “I’m part of a shrinking middle class” is meh. “I’m a very special bunny, completely unique and not like anybody else” is very pleasing. It’s the self contemplating the self. What can be more enjoyable than that?

      Liked by 1 person

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    I agree with this. I would tweak this argument by saying that neoliberalism actually promotes identity because companies can market new products to specific identity groups and they can leverage identity to attract specific consumers through advertising to them. In short, neoliberalism loves identity because it’s good for business.

    About economic mobility: I would say yes and no in response to your claim. There are some people who are able to use their identity–their manufactured identity–to promote and market themselves in the world and online, and in doing so, they can get the better, more prestigious jobs, whether in the real world or online.

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      Absolutely. Neoliberalism is amazing for some people. It’s almost magical in how good it can be. As any casino, it will have some winners. And what they win will be so far beyond the simply economic. It will be a plenitude of existence like no other, an incredible joy. Of course, everybody is eager to place bets when a potential win is so big.

      Like

      1. Clarissa Avatar

        As an example, here’s a sincere description of how top colleges select applicants based on the very neoliberal neuroses that they manifest:

        https://x.com/CoreyWriting/status/2094530934825488682

        Such people exist. They are highly neurotic in a very specific way. But they’ll be very happy in the neoliberal setup.

        The problem is, everybody who is not a maniacally obsessive, mega special cookie won’t cut it.

        Like

  3. Stille Avatar
    Stille

    I think you’ve just made something click for me.

    It is very important for me that I get to choose my own bondage. I am, as I used to joke, built to operate in a high-pressure environment. If it’s absent, I will create it around me. Right now my dayjob is exploding and I am lower anxiety about it than I’ve been in ages, like all of a sudden I have the mental bandwidth to fix shit around the house that has gone unfixed for months. Like the SR-71 Blackbird plane (whose main defense was that it flew faster than the bombs chasing it), I leak oil out of every joint while stationary at sea level but get me up to cruise speed at 12k meters and I am the epitome of chillness. So hard shit is going to happen, but it feels skin-gratingly obscene if I don’t get to choose it. A violation. There’s a Sylvia Plath quote making the rounds of RW Twitter and they’re all like look how easy she had it, when it’s all about how she found the soft shackles of modern marriage unbearable.

    Like

Leave a comment